Robotics and Automation in Construction 2008
DOI: 10.5772/6193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Tests for Wireless Real-Time Localization Systems to Improve Mobile Robot Navigation in Various Indoor Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the fact that emitters are mounted on the mobile robot, it is possible to determine the direction of a route based on information from these sensors. The robot can also determine its position by examining the signal intensity [26]. Local localization can be achieved when appropriate sensors/cameras are deployed in a building, which transmit information to a central unit [27].…”
Section: The Classification and Selection Of Localization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the fact that emitters are mounted on the mobile robot, it is possible to determine the direction of a route based on information from these sensors. The robot can also determine its position by examining the signal intensity [26]. Local localization can be achieved when appropriate sensors/cameras are deployed in a building, which transmit information to a central unit [27].…”
Section: The Classification and Selection Of Localization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global location determination and simple navigation thanks to extensive maps Limited range (mainly indoors) [12], [17], [28,29], [35], [47] Radio waves Medium Good accuracy, resistant to harsh environmental conditions Application of complex data processing algorithms [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], [49] Vision system High Very high accuracy, can be used virtually anywhere, ambient mapping Mainly based on artificial intelligence, so very sophisticated image recognition algorithms [9][10][11][12], [27], [41], [46] Follow Poor dirt resistance, complex information processing [9], [13], [45,46], [48] Other markers [-] Easy to find (self) robot, with known marker location High density of markers needed for decent work [10], [27], [48] 3. A review of the selected localization methods…”
Section: Gnss (Gps) Mediummentioning
confidence: 99%