34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 1998
DOI: 10.2514/6.1998-3933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance testing of a resistojet thruster for small satellite applications

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Info… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6. The heat transfer efficiency decreased from the Mark-I to the Mark-II thruster, which was verified by conducting a Knudsen number and Reynolds number analysis looking at the nozzle flow conditions [3]. The heat transfer efficiency only reached 12 per cent with an I sp of 84 s (see Fig.…”
Section: Efficiency This Was a Factor Of 2 Higher Than That Formentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6. The heat transfer efficiency decreased from the Mark-I to the Mark-II thruster, which was verified by conducting a Knudsen number and Reynolds number analysis looking at the nozzle flow conditions [3]. The heat transfer efficiency only reached 12 per cent with an I sp of 84 s (see Fig.…”
Section: Efficiency This Was a Factor Of 2 Higher Than That Formentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This system was chosen due to its density I sp , self-pressurization, ease of handling and performance. More information about UoSAT-12 can be found in reference [3]. Table 6 shows the performance of the UoSAT-12 resistojet system including the mass breakdown and system specifications.…”
Section: Uosat-12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clogging may occur, for example, due to oxidation of nozzle material ( Figure 5). 11 Micronozzle blockage occurs by in-flow particles since their size becomes comparable with micronozzle throat diameter. These particles are also responsible for the erosion of nozzle material.…”
Section: F -2n (P E -P a )A Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oxidation of the 316 stainless steel at temperatures about 1000°C caused flaking which gradually clogged the nozzle. Hastelloy (oxidant resistant up to temperatures above 1000°C) was successfully used in the later designs 11. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, there was some uncertainty about the launch vehicle which drove the program office to consider a propulsion system to perform the orbit raising. A traditional PPT-based system developed by Primex Aerospace under a NASA contract was initially planned [10], but was later exchanged for a higher thrust system based on a water resistojet (WRT) developed by Surrey Satellite Technologies, LTD [11]. Ultimately, the OSP was selected as the launch vehicle which eliminated the need for a propulsion system, and it was removed from the satellite.…”
Section: Techsat 21 Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%