R esearch on training transfer continues to intrigue scholars and workplace practitioners interested in discovering how best to support the application of new learning. As organizations attempt to maximize human capital investments, leveraging knowledge from training and other performance interventions is critical to maintaining a competitive advantage. Training and other learning investment expenditures (measured in U.S. companies) approximate over $100 billion of firm budget allocations each year (Paradise, 2007); however, most reports of training transfer indicate only a small amount of new learning is actually applied on the job. In a review of evaluation benchmarking data conducted by Knowledge Advisors, a human capital metrics firm, organizations reported that trainees had applied less than 40% of their knowledge and skills from training experiences when measured 90 days after training. The remaining 60% is considered "scrap learning" (Berk, 2008, p. 46), a term used to describe knowledge-and thus investments in learning-that is wasted. This high "scrap" ratio, which is commensurate with other transfer reports (Fitzpatrick, 2001;Newstrom, 1986;Saks & Belcourt, 2006), raises concerns about the efficacy of training as a performance improvement intervention.Training transfer is not a new phenomenon to human resource development (HRD) and performance improvement practitioners or scholars. Of the learning and development issues that typically plague organizations, how to support learners in using their new knowledge and skills to enhance performance is a constant challenge. Research suggests that organizations must address cognitive, psychological, behavioral, and cultural aspects of work performance to enhance training application (Holton, Bates, & Ruona, Data were gathered from members of a large professional training organization regarding their practices for supporting training transfer. Transfer factor categories grounded in the literature were used to code the data using content analysis procedures. Commensurate with the transfer literature, results suggest that trainers reported strategies used within the training setting and in the work environment as having the most influence on training transfer. Transfer practices that do not have a firm grounding in the research but that emerged in the data, trainer characteristics and evaluation practices, were reported by trainers as being important influences on training transfer. This study extends previous work on training transfer practices by elucidating the specific transfer influences perceived by training professionals as critical for supporting transfer in organizations. Implications for practice and research are offered that focus on building trainer proficiency for training transfer in organizational settings.