2017
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.22914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance study of multistage membrane and hybrid distillation processes for propylene/propane separation

Abstract: This article investigates the separation performance and energy efficiency of multistage membrane and hybrid processes for the separation of propane/propylene mixtures compared with the conventional distillation process. To satisfy the separation objective of 0.996 mol/mol (99.6 mol%) C3H6 purity and 97 % C3H6 separation recovery ratio, a detailed parametric study for the multistage membrane and hybrid process systems was described. For this purpose, the effects of operating conditions and process configuratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows separation to be enhanced and, in some cases, break the azeotrope in nonideal mixtures. [5,6] The HDPS performs better than conventional distillation schemes in separating close boiling point and nonideal mixtures. For instance, a reduction in energy consumption and operating cost, and the fact that an entrainer is not required are some of the benefits of a HDPS in comparison to conventional distillation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows separation to be enhanced and, in some cases, break the azeotrope in nonideal mixtures. [5,6] The HDPS performs better than conventional distillation schemes in separating close boiling point and nonideal mixtures. For instance, a reduction in energy consumption and operating cost, and the fact that an entrainer is not required are some of the benefits of a HDPS in comparison to conventional distillation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the critical conditions must be controlled to suppress the possible generation of interfacial voids. Recently, the concept of in-situ growth of MOFs in a polymer matrix was proposed for the fabrication of MMMs for gas separation [ 78 , 79 , 80 ]. As revealed in Figure 9 , four steps are required: polymer hydrolysis, ion exchange, ligand treatment, and imidization for the in situ formation of MMMs [ 77 ].…”
Section: Current Membrane Materials For C 3 H 6 /C 3 H 8 Sepamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 and C 3 H 8 increased with the enhancement of feed gas pressure (2-5 Bar), while the C 3 H 6 /C 3 H 8 selectivity appeared a downward trend. On the one hand, according to the solution-diffusion model (FigureS11), the Si and Di of C 3 H 6 and C 3 H 8 all increased with the enhancement of feed gas pressure which resulted in an enhancement permeability of propylene and propane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Membrane-based gas separation with small-footprint, low energy consumption and easy operation, 5 was paid more attention for C 3 H 6 /C 3 H 8 separations. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Many kinds of membranes have been reported for propylene/propane separation, such as polymer, 7,14,15 MOFs, 9,16,17 carbon molecular sieves (CMS), [18][19][20] and facilitated transport membrane. [21][22][23] Nevertheless, polymeric membrane suffers from a well-known trade-off effect between permeability and selectivity, making it difficult to achieve high permeability and selectivity simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%