Performance Study of IPv6/IPv4 MANET (64MANET) Architecture

Manimozhi, S.; Jayanthi, J.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-24051-6_59

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The three different transition mechanisms are dual-stack, tunneling, and protocol translators. These mechanisms are different from each other and thus require different configurations and operations [5,8,11]- [19] (1) Dual-Stack-The dual-stack works irrespective of the IP, i.e., the routers and nodes are enabled and support both IPv4 and IPv6. This transition mechanism allows us to have the benefits of both IPv4 and IPv6 parallelly at the same instance; it means that no separate arrangements are required; thus, no conversion issues occur, and shown in Fig.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Comparison Between Different Tunneling Techniques Using Different Routing Protocols

Jain

Payal

2021

Wireless Pers Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Migration to IPv6 becomes a priority with the draining of IPv4 addresses. But both IPv4 and IPv6 have different structures, and directly bringing IPv6 into the current IPv4 network does not work due to their compatibility issues. Therefore, Dual-Stack, Tunneling, and Protocol Translator mechanisms are adopted to smooth the transition between IPv4 and IPv6 networks. The transitions allow us to communicate between both IPv4 and IPv6 networks together despite having their different structures. The proper transition mechanism has to be adopted for a complex network, and the in-depth study and analysis can help find the best transition technique. In this paper, the 6to4 tunneling is configured for a real-time network using real-time applications-FTP and Email, and the performance of the transition between IPv4 and IPv6 addressing networks is evaluated. For analysis, the automatic and manual 6to4 tunneling is configured simultaneously with Routing Information Protocol/ Routing Information Protocol next generation and Open Shortest Path First/Open Shortest Path First version 3 routing protocols. The networks are configured and simulated on the Riverbed Modeler Academic Edition 17.5. These cases are analyzed and compared for global performance parameters as traffic dropped, network convergence duration, and traffic sent. The object performance parameters for point-to-point connections are analyzed as queuing delay and throughput for incoming and outgoing traffic. This novel work is helpful for researchers as it gives a detailed study to choose the appropriate tunneling technique with a mixture of proper routing protocols for efficient performance.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%