2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.06.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance studies on mixed-mode forced convection solar cabinet dryer under different air mass flow rates for drying of cluster fig

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment of drying efficiency by Silva et al [10] and Cesar et al [20] are 6.10% and 8.20%, respectively. The SMER of 0.616 kg/kWh and SEC of 1.623 kg/kWh have been determined by Ekka et al [16]. Present results of energy performance indicators are well comparable with the earlier research works.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Energy Performance Indicators Of the Drying Sy...supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The assessment of drying efficiency by Silva et al [10] and Cesar et al [20] are 6.10% and 8.20%, respectively. The SMER of 0.616 kg/kWh and SEC of 1.623 kg/kWh have been determined by Ekka et al [16]. Present results of energy performance indicators are well comparable with the earlier research works.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Energy Performance Indicators Of the Drying Sy...supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The PVT solar dryer aims to acquire the most significant amount of energy to be carried by air to the food while also removing the moisture present in the food in the least period. In order to choose the optimal drying method for a given product, the analysis of the impact of airflow and temperature on the system performance is necessary [16]- [18]. As the demand for efficient and sustainable processes grows, energetic and exergetic analysis of dryers becomes increasingly essential to enhance the design and technical sustainability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the ratio of actual moisture evaporated during the drying process to the total moisture removal capacity of the drying air. It is also called the effectiveness of a solar dryer [ 22 ]. where m a = Mass flow rate of drying air (kg/s), t = time (s), h sat = adiabatic saturation humidity of the air entering the dryer (kg water/kg dry air), and h in = absolute humidity of the air entering the dryer (kg water/kg dry air).…”
Section: Performance Parameters and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reciprocal of specific energy consumption is considered as the specific moisture extraction rate ( SMER ). It shows the amount of moisture evaporated per unit of energy supplied [ 22 , 32 ]: …”
Section: Performance Parameters and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive dryers are more economical and cheaper as reported by (Balasuadhakar, Fisseha, Atenafu, & Bino, 2016). Several studies classify solar dryers as direct, indirect, or mixed mode, and divide them into three types: cabinet (box), greenhouse, and tent, which come in a variety of sizes, shapes, and designs, as described by (Ekka, Muthukumar, Bala, Kanaujiya, & Pakshirajan, 2021). The air movement, mode of heat transfer, and design are the most typical approaches for solar dryers, as discussed in (Bhardwaj, Kumar, Kumar, Goel, & Chauhan, 2021;Chavan, Vitankar, Mujumdar, & Thorat, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%