2016
DOI: 10.1002/pam.21910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Standards and Employee Effort: Evidence From Teacher Absences

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because we derive CBA subarea restrictiveness and salary measures from the coded CBAs themselves, we only have these measures in one pre- and in one post-recession period, necessitating the use of a relatively simple DiD. However, because our pupil-teacher ratios are generated from a longitudinal panel of district-level data, we are able to specify a more flexible (and therefore more informative) difference-in-difference model that takes the form of an event study, showing the relationship between “treatment” (NBA status) and student-to-teacher ratio in each of the years before, during, and after the recession (e.g., Gershenson, 2016; Simon, Soni, & Cawley, 2017). This model takes the following form:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because we derive CBA subarea restrictiveness and salary measures from the coded CBAs themselves, we only have these measures in one pre- and in one post-recession period, necessitating the use of a relatively simple DiD. However, because our pupil-teacher ratios are generated from a longitudinal panel of district-level data, we are able to specify a more flexible (and therefore more informative) difference-in-difference model that takes the form of an event study, showing the relationship between “treatment” (NBA status) and student-to-teacher ratio in each of the years before, during, and after the recession (e.g., Gershenson, 2016; Simon, Soni, & Cawley, 2017). This model takes the following form:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Teacher absences fell in response to increased accountability pressure suggests that one mechanism through which consequential accountability policies affect student achievement is through increased teacher effort" (Gerhenson, 2015). Monitoring attendance encompasses ISSN 2162-3058 2019 employees" productivity or students" performance (Deane & Murphy, 2016) while the working environment where the learning takes place, and the factors relevant to that environment were seen by many researchers as the key factors to achieving quality teaching, and more importantly good turn out in teacher attendance (McKenzie et al, 2014).…”
Section: Issues/concerns In Monitoring Academic Staff Attendancementioning
confidence: 99%