2011
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2011.2146786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Requirements for Ionospheric Correction of Low-Frequency SAR Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FR transfers backscattered energy between the four polarization channels, and if it is not corrected to better than 5 • , derived geophysical parameters such as woody biomass density will be significantly affected [12], [13]. In an assessment of ionospheric correction requirements for a variety of low-frequency SAR applications, Meyer [14] proposed a more stringent FR correction performance of 1.2 • (maximum standard error) for polarimetry over a general set of ground cover types. An accurate estimate of FR is also required for calibrating the SAR using dedicated calibration targets [15], [16]) FR causes each pixel of the measured four-channel image, M , to deviate from the true backscattering matrix S according to the relation…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FR transfers backscattered energy between the four polarization channels, and if it is not corrected to better than 5 • , derived geophysical parameters such as woody biomass density will be significantly affected [12], [13]. In an assessment of ionospheric correction requirements for a variety of low-frequency SAR applications, Meyer [14] proposed a more stringent FR correction performance of 1.2 • (maximum standard error) for polarimetry over a general set of ground cover types. An accurate estimate of FR is also required for calibrating the SAR using dedicated calibration targets [15], [16]) FR causes each pixel of the measured four-channel image, M , to deviate from the true backscattering matrix S according to the relation…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomass technical requirements (see [1, p. 78]) define a threshold NESZ of −27 dB (with a goal of −30 dB) while the crosstalk threshold is −25 dB (with a goal of −30 dB). The values of channel imbalance and crosstalk are likely to vary during the mission and therefore will be estimated in orbit, probably using a combination of polarimetric active radar calibrators and passive reflectors [1], [14], [15], [17]. However, errors in FR estimation during calibration and additive polarimetric noise in the calibrators will cause residual errors in the values of the system calibration terms [15]; these will affect subsequent Biomass measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the ionosphere on phase delay tends to be long wavelength (hundreds of km) and, except in the case of L-band data, is commonly ignored. There are, however, several methods for estimating the effect, if necessary (Meyer 2011). Phase delay during propagation through the troposphere, on the other hand, is equally significant at all microwave frequencies and variability is significant over short distances.…”
Section: Atmospheric Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the power of the jamming signals is relatively larger compared to that of the useful signals, and thus the threshold can be easily chosen. Usually, we set η ∈ [2,10]. With classified basis signals, one can find the basis matrix set corresponding to NBI, and the NBI is expressed as…”
Section: A Theory Of Nbi Suppression Using Icamentioning
confidence: 99%