2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2005.12.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance prediction of TBM disc cutting on granitic rock by the linear cutting test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radius of the disc cutter in the numerical models is 0.2 m, which is similar to the actual size of the disc cutter in a LCM test (Chang et al, 2006). The advancing speed of the disc cutter has been reported to have little effect on the cutting force (Chang et al, 2006); consequently, the advancing speed and the rotating angular speed of the disc cutter are set at 2.0 m/sec and 10 rad/ sec, respectively.…”
Section: Model Geometry and Input Datamentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The radius of the disc cutter in the numerical models is 0.2 m, which is similar to the actual size of the disc cutter in a LCM test (Chang et al, 2006). The advancing speed of the disc cutter has been reported to have little effect on the cutting force (Chang et al, 2006); consequently, the advancing speed and the rotating angular speed of the disc cutter are set at 2.0 m/sec and 10 rad/ sec, respectively.…”
Section: Model Geometry and Input Datamentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The advancing speed of the disc cutter has been reported to have little effect on the cutting force (Chang et al, 2006); consequently, the advancing speed and the rotating angular speed of the disc cutter are set at 2.0 m/sec and 10 rad/ sec, respectively. The penetration depth of the disc cutter into the rock samples is set at 0.004 m, and the lower boundary is regarded as a fixed displacement boundary to restrict the motion of the rock sample during the cutting simulations.…”
Section: Model Geometry and Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wear resulting from friction energy consumption is the main cause of disc cutter failure (Nakayama, 1965;Chang et al, 2006). The method for determining the prediction model in this paper is to use friction energy to estimate the disc cutter wear.…”
Section: Prediction Model Of Disc Cutter Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, cutting tool size can be on the order of 10 -40cm (e.g. Chang et al 2006, Xue et al 2009) and is specified based upon the diameter of the TBM, TBM type, and the ground conditions (soil type and overburden pressure). This paper will assume large cutting tools with a size of 40cm in order to determine their maximum influence.…”
Section: Tbm Tunneling Environment and The Interface Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%