2009
DOI: 10.1002/int.20373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance optimization of object comparison

Abstract: Comparing objects can be considered as a hierarchical process. Separate aspects of objects are compared to each other, and the results of these comparisons are combined into a single result in one or more steps by aggregation operators. The set of operators used to compare the objects and the way these operators are related with each other is called the comparison scheme. If a threshold is applied to the final result of the object comparison, the mathematical properties of the operators in the comparison schem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NC value of each node pair is plotted as a function of its ND value (Figure c). It can be seen that most points are located near the antidiagonal, suggesting that they follow the general rule of networks: correlation decreases with distance increase. In addition, a certain number of points present a considerable deviation from the antidiagonal. Points located in the upper-right half of the diagram have NC values larger than those along the antidiagonal (1-ND), suggesting that the corresponding node pairs have larger correlations than the node pairs with average correlation values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The NC value of each node pair is plotted as a function of its ND value (Figure c). It can be seen that most points are located near the antidiagonal, suggesting that they follow the general rule of networks: correlation decreases with distance increase. In addition, a certain number of points present a considerable deviation from the antidiagonal. Points located in the upper-right half of the diagram have NC values larger than those along the antidiagonal (1-ND), suggesting that the corresponding node pairs have larger correlations than the node pairs with average correlation values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The bibliometric method is understood as an approach to analyzing academic publications using statistical and mathematical methods (Mora et al, 2017;Li & Lei, 2021;Wang et al, 2021). This method uses a quantitative approach from the database bibliography (Naruethradhol & Gebsombut, 2020;Gomezelj, 2016;La Paz et al, 2020;Merigo & Yang, 2017;Dabiae et al, 2020;Dwekat et al, 2020;De Tre et al, 2014), to analyze the main areas of research, trending topics/themes that are developing in the Journal (Martínez-López et al, 2018;Jiang et al, 2019) and research fields. The bibliometric analysis focuses on examining themes, authors, citations, co-citations, methodology, and keyword occurrences (Kabongo, 2019;Koseoglu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlation-based Feature Selection (CFS) evaluates feature subsets using heuristic search functions instead of exhaustive search strategies [103]. Additionally, minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) ranks the importance of feature subsets for classification problems [104,105].…”
Section: Filter-based Fs Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%