2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-014-3598-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance on a strategy set shifting task in rats following adult or adolescent cocaine exposure

Abstract: Rationale Neuropsychological testing is widespread in adult cocaine abusers, but lacking in teens. Animal models may provide insight into age-related neuropsychological consequences of cocaine exposure. Objectives Determine whether developmental plasticity protects or hinders behavioral flexibility after cocaine exposure in adolescent vs. adult rats. Methods Using a yoked-triad design, one rat controlled cocaine delivery and the other two passively received cocaine or saline. Rats controlling cocaine deliv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(103 reference statements)
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance on an attentional set-shifting task revealed no performance deficits after adolescent cocaine exposure, with adolescent exposed rats conversely exhibiting more rapid shifts in performance on the set-shifting task than controls, perhaps due to alterations in attentional mechanisms; this effect was evident when exposed animals were tested in adulthood (P70) but not late adolescence (P56) (Black et al, 2006). These findings differ somewhat from those of Kantak et al, (2014) where both adolescent (P37–55) and adult (P77–95) rats were allowed to either self-administer cocaine or were given cocaine non-contingently, and tested >2 weeks later on a strategy set-shifting task and reversal. Adolescent cocaine exposure did not disrupt performance on the set-shifting task, although non-contingent (but not self-administered) cocaine during adolescence impaired reversal acquisition.…”
Section: Cocainecontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Performance on an attentional set-shifting task revealed no performance deficits after adolescent cocaine exposure, with adolescent exposed rats conversely exhibiting more rapid shifts in performance on the set-shifting task than controls, perhaps due to alterations in attentional mechanisms; this effect was evident when exposed animals were tested in adulthood (P70) but not late adolescence (P56) (Black et al, 2006). These findings differ somewhat from those of Kantak et al, (2014) where both adolescent (P37–55) and adult (P77–95) rats were allowed to either self-administer cocaine or were given cocaine non-contingently, and tested >2 weeks later on a strategy set-shifting task and reversal. Adolescent cocaine exposure did not disrupt performance on the set-shifting task, although non-contingent (but not self-administered) cocaine during adolescence impaired reversal acquisition.…”
Section: Cocainecontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…This lack of notable effects of adolescent cocaine exposure on “executive function”-type tasks that rely in part on circuitry involving the PFC contrast with compelling evidence for neural alterations in these regions, as discussed below. Indeed, Kantak and colleagues (2014) suggested that the immaturity of the PFC during adolescence may exert a protective effect against cognitive alterations from repeated cocaine exposure. Clearly, more studies in this area are warranted.…”
Section: Cocainementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult-onset females with a history of METH self-administration committed fewer early errors than their counterparts. Interestingly, this is consistent with two studies that reported facilitation of operant strategy reversal in males exposed to amphetamine during adolescence (Hankosky et al, 2013) and in males that self-administered cocaine during adulthood (Kantak et al, 2014). Although the cause of this facilitation is not known, it is possible that adult-onset females did not learn the original strategy as well and subsequently shifted faster due to reduced proactive interference (Sherrill et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Age may play a role in the cocaine/Tat‐mediated mPFC neuronal over‐excitation. Although adolescent and adult rats show comparable intakes of self‐administered cocaine (Kerstetter & Kantak, ), the consequences of self‐administered cocaine differentially affect performance on PFC‐mediated tasks (Harvey et al ., ; Kantak et al ., ). In addition to age differences, the adolescent rats in our prior study received a large single bolus of experimenter‐injected cocaine once daily for 5 days (Napier et al ., ); in the current study, rats were trained to self‐administer (self‐titrate) small doses of cocaine over a 2‐h operant session for 14 days in the presence of cocaine‐paired cues, and such differences may also have contributed to the disparity in neurophysiological consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%