2017
DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1370134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance on a 1-week delayed recall task is associated with medial temporal lobe structures in neurologically normal older adults

Abstract: Objective Traditional episodic memory tests employ a delayed recall length ranging from 10-30 minutes. The neurobiological process of memory consolidation extends well beyond these time intervals, however, raising the possibility that these tests might not be fully sensitive to the subtle neurocognitive changes found in early disease or age-related decline. We aimed to determine the sensitivity of a 1-week delayed recall paradigm to medial temporal lobe (MTL) structure among neurologically normal older adults.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other research groups have similarly demonstrated that individuals with subjective cognitive complaints (Manes, Serrano, Calcagno, Cardozo, & Hodges, 2008), pre-symptomatic autosomal dominant AD (Weston et al, 2018), and epilepsy (Butler et al, 2007) show poor performances on extended (1-6 weeks) delayed recall paradigms despite normal performance on memory tests with briefer delays. Neuroanatomically, we also found that worse 1-week delayed recall was cross-sectionally associated with smaller MTL volumes in clinically normal older adults, whereas standard delay periods (20-30 min) were not (Saloner et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Other research groups have similarly demonstrated that individuals with subjective cognitive complaints (Manes, Serrano, Calcagno, Cardozo, & Hodges, 2008), pre-symptomatic autosomal dominant AD (Weston et al, 2018), and epilepsy (Butler et al, 2007) show poor performances on extended (1-6 weeks) delayed recall paradigms despite normal performance on memory tests with briefer delays. Neuroanatomically, we also found that worse 1-week delayed recall was cross-sectionally associated with smaller MTL volumes in clinically normal older adults, whereas standard delay periods (20-30 min) were not (Saloner et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The essential role of medial temporal structures for the consolidation of new information has been known for a long time [50]. The results were consistent with a number of previous studies that have demonstrated relationships between the MTL sub-regions in hippocampus, parahippocampal and delayed recall [47,[51][52][53]. But except for that, we have found the cortical thickness in right superior temporal was correlated with short and long delay recalls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, examining our data does not support this interpretation since there is enough variability to exclude a ceiling effect. Second, as demonstrated by Saloner et al [ 56 ], the delayed recall length for episodic memory may be important for highlighting differences in performance. Indeed, the delayed recall length usually used in experimental settings ranges from 5 to 30 min, but Saloner et al [ 56 ] demonstrated that experiments that use longer delays (e.g., 1-week) are more sensitive to detecting differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, as demonstrated by Saloner et al [ 56 ], the delayed recall length for episodic memory may be important for highlighting differences in performance. Indeed, the delayed recall length usually used in experimental settings ranges from 5 to 30 min, but Saloner et al [ 56 ] demonstrated that experiments that use longer delays (e.g., 1-week) are more sensitive to detecting differences. This finding is in agreement with the knowledge that the neurobiological process of memory consolidation extends well beyond the experimental time intervals, raising the possibility that tests using shorter delays (such as the WalCT) might not be fully sensitive to detecting subtle neurocognitive changes produced by OC use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%