2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-014-3243-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Weibull function as a diameter distribution model for Pinus thunbergii stands in the eastern coast of South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Weibull function has been used widely in predicting diameter distribution for various types of forests and obtained satisfactory results [18,[22][23][24][25][26][44][45][46]. Because it possesses many advantages, including the flexibility of its curve for characterizing different forest types, its parameters could be helpful to explain the stand structure through DBH distribution, and the interval of DBH classes could be easy to calculate [18,22,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Weibull function has been used widely in predicting diameter distribution for various types of forests and obtained satisfactory results [18,[22][23][24][25][26][44][45][46]. Because it possesses many advantages, including the flexibility of its curve for characterizing different forest types, its parameters could be helpful to explain the stand structure through DBH distribution, and the interval of DBH classes could be easy to calculate [18,22,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weibull distribution parameters have been predicted using parameter prediction methods (PPM) (Abino et al 2016;Özçelik et al 2016) and various parameter recovery methods (PRM) (Leduc et al 2001;Liu et al 2004;Burkhart and Tomé 2012). Ordinary least squares (OLS) and seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) analysis have been used to estimate the coefficients of the parameter prediction models (Zellner 1962;Siipilehto et al 2007;Poudel and Cao 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…  = Crown length (m) of  th individual trees,   = Tree expansion factor corrected to a per ha basis for the  th trees.같이 적합도지수, 변동계수 등으로 검토하였다. 시업지 임분 의 D q , D 0 , D 25 , D 50 , D 95 의 적합도지수는 0.58 (D 0 )∼0.96 (D 50 )으로 나타났으며, 비시업지 임분은 0.58 (D 0 )∼0.96 (D 50 )로 기존 연구에서 제시한 모델의 모수 적합도지수와 유사하게 나타났다(Lumbres and Lee, 2014;Abino et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2018).고사율에 영향을 미치는 인자들의 조합을 고려하여 총…”
unclassified