2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(01)00638-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of ultrafiltration membranes in ethanol–water solutions: effect of membrane conditioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases, except for the Nadir membranes (N30F and NF-PES-010) with n-hexane, the degree of swelling is higher in water than in the organic solvents. This phenomenon was also reported by Oikawa et al (1991) for reverse osmosis membranes and by Shukla and Cheryan (2002) for ultraÿltration membranes. Swelling for ethanol is also more important than for the other organic solvents.…”
Section: Swelling and Rejectionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In all cases, except for the Nadir membranes (N30F and NF-PES-010) with n-hexane, the degree of swelling is higher in water than in the organic solvents. This phenomenon was also reported by Oikawa et al (1991) for reverse osmosis membranes and by Shukla and Cheryan (2002) for ultraÿltration membranes. Swelling for ethanol is also more important than for the other organic solvents.…”
Section: Swelling and Rejectionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Whu et al [8] studied performance of nanofiltration membrane with methanol and reported that membranes initially exhibit considerable time dependence for change in flux and rejection while becoming time invariant later on. Recently, Shukla and Cheryan [9] reported studies on UF of organic solvents. They reported a significant effect of membrane conditioning on performance of UF membrane in ethanol-water solution and subsequently suggested a conditioning scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have investigated the effect of solvent on the flux of asymmetric or composite membranes [25,26]. Furthermore, as the PEI content came to 15 wt-%, pure water flux changed remarkably with the increase in PEG additive.…”
Section: Influence Of Peg Concentration On Pure Water Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%