2005
DOI: 10.1190/1.1996909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of time-delay estimators

Abstract: I analyze the problem of estimating differences in the arrival times of a seismic wavefront recorded by an array of sensors. The two-sensor problem is tackled first, showing that even an approximate knowledge of the wavelet, such as its power spectrum, can substantially increase the accuracy of the time-delay estimate and reduce the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) threshold for reliable time-delay estimation. The use of the complex trace, although beneficial for time-delay estimates in the presence of frequency-in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the multichannel cross correlation method (MCCC; VanDecar and Crosson 1990) to calculate the relative arrival time to correct the travel time. As shown by Bagaini (2005), MCCC is often the best approach for noisy data and is less prone to cycle skipping. Equation 6 in VanDecar and Crosson (1990) is used for calculating the delay times for each station, which is equivalent to the average of the time shifts measured relative to the other stations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We use the multichannel cross correlation method (MCCC; VanDecar and Crosson 1990) to calculate the relative arrival time to correct the travel time. As shown by Bagaini (2005), MCCC is often the best approach for noisy data and is less prone to cycle skipping. Equation 6 in VanDecar and Crosson (1990) is used for calculating the delay times for each station, which is equivalent to the average of the time shifts measured relative to the other stations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The following form can be assumed for the microseismic data recorded at two different receivers (Bagaini, 2005)…”
Section: Iterative Cross-correlation Based Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time delay is estimated from the lag at the peak value of the cross correlation between x 1 (t) and x 2 (t). Bagaini (2005) evaluated the performance of different time-delay estimators where reference traces obtained from various selection schemes are used. It is shown that the iteratively updating the reference signal provides better time-delay estimation than non-iterative schemes where reference trace is selected from sensors within the array or by simple stacking.…”
Section: Iterative Cross-correlation Based Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this view, frequency-dependent delays or phase shifts are considered to Manuscript degrade the estimate of τ, as a consequence of imperfect coupling of the seismometer with the ground, of intrinsic attenuation, or of nearsurface reverberations. We refer to Bagaini (2005) for an extensive review of the performance of crosscorrelation estimation methods with this view in mind. Others have attempted to force crosscorrelation delay times to approach the classical onset times by giving more weight to the early part of the seismogram (Woodward and Masters, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%