1998
DOI: 10.1007/s001900050209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of three types of Stokes's kernel in the combined solution for the geoid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of this step can be called the near-zone (NZ) residual Helmert cogeoid. For details, see Vaníček and Featherstone (1998) and Novák et al (2001).…”
Section: Stokes-helmert Method Present State and Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The result of this step can be called the near-zone (NZ) residual Helmert cogeoid. For details, see Vaníček and Featherstone (1998) and Novák et al (2001).…”
Section: Stokes-helmert Method Present State and Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of this step is the total residual Helmert cogeoid. More details are found in (Molodenskij et al, 1960;Vaníček and Featherstone, 1998).…”
Section: Stokes-helmert Method Present State and Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(9) (cf. Vaníček and Featherstone 1998). Therefore, it is important to consider the kernel modification not only as means to reduce the truncation error, but also as a filter to reduce leakage of any low-frequency errors from the terrestrial data (cf.…”
Section: Inclusion Of An Egmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heck 1990) that can propagate into the combined geoid solution unless modelled and/or filtered out (cf. Vaníček and Featherstone 1998;Wang et al 2011;Featherstone et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation