2009
DOI: 10.1097/mej.0b013e328304ae6d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the Wells and Revised Geneva scores for predicting pulmonary embolism

Abstract: The Wells rule seems to be more accurate among both inpatients and emergency department patients. The Revised Geneva score can be used in emergency department patients with high reliability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
16
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
16
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14,15 To our knowledge the present study is the first to validate the utility of the scoring system in inpatients receiving prophylactic anticoagulation. As would be expected, the prevalence of PE in our population was lower than the 9% to 30% that has previously been reported in patients not receiving prophylactic anticoagulation, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] consistent with the 68% to 76% reduction in the risk of deep venous thrombosis that occurs with use of low-dose heparin or low molecular weight heparin. 16 Similar to the findings of Arnason et al 17 a large proportion of this inpatient cohort was classified as PE-likely on the basis of only 3 of the 7 variables-tachycardia, immobility or previous surgery, and the absence of a more likely competing diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…14,15 To our knowledge the present study is the first to validate the utility of the scoring system in inpatients receiving prophylactic anticoagulation. As would be expected, the prevalence of PE in our population was lower than the 9% to 30% that has previously been reported in patients not receiving prophylactic anticoagulation, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] consistent with the 68% to 76% reduction in the risk of deep venous thrombosis that occurs with use of low-dose heparin or low molecular weight heparin. 16 Similar to the findings of Arnason et al 17 a large proportion of this inpatient cohort was classified as PE-likely on the basis of only 3 of the 7 variables-tachycardia, immobility or previous surgery, and the absence of a more likely competing diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…These findings lead to the conclusion that CTPE studies were performed excessively in this cohort of patients. Previous studies validating the Wells score enrolled combinations of inpatients and outpatients [8][9][10][11][12][13] or outpatients exclusively. 14,15 To our knowledge the present study is the first to validate the utility of the scoring system in inpatients receiving prophylactic anticoagulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the findings appear promising, neither of these variables can currently be recommended as a screening tool for pulmonary embolism until larger prospective studies examine their performance either alone or with preexisting rules. 39,40 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modifikuota Geneva skalė paremta vien objektyviais klinikiniais kriterijais, todėl klinicisto subjektyvumas ir turima klinikinė patirtis neturi įtakos paciento įvertinimui (22). Manyta, kad PATE tikėtinumo nustatymas remiantis modifikuota Geneva skale yra objektyvesnis nei remiantis Wells skale (22), tačiau studijos, lyginusios šias skales tarpusavyje, Wells skalę nustatė esant jautresnę ir specifiškesnę nei modifikuota Geneva skalė (11,(23)(24)(25). Nedaug studijų lygino šių skalių prognostinę vertę diagnozuojant PATE senyvo amžiaus pacientams (23).…”
Section: Rezultatų Aptarimasunclassified