1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6701(85)80026-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the surface air system air samplers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To relate the deposition to the bioaerosol concentration in the air requires taking air samples. While this is straightforward, [17] it is well documented that sampler efficiencies are far from 100%, with some estimated to sample well below 50% of the viable concentration in the air [42]. The settle plate approach used to measure deposition is unlikely to experience microbial losses due to physical damage from impaction that is present in an air sampler, but may still underestimate total counts as it is based on colony formation after incubation.…”
Section: Implications Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To relate the deposition to the bioaerosol concentration in the air requires taking air samples. While this is straightforward, [17] it is well documented that sampler efficiencies are far from 100%, with some estimated to sample well below 50% of the viable concentration in the air [42]. The settle plate approach used to measure deposition is unlikely to experience microbial losses due to physical damage from impaction that is present in an air sampler, but may still underestimate total counts as it is based on colony formation after incubation.…”
Section: Implications Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial and fungal contamination of air and surfaces was determined on days 1, 15, and 60 of each randomization period. Air contamination was assessed separately for the central corridor and individual patient's rooms with a surface air system sampler (PBI International) equipped with 36-cm 2 Petri dishes, 18 each containing culture medium specific for different strains. In each sampling procedure, 180 L air was aspirated over 120 seconds far from surfaces and human bodies at a constant height of 1.5 m from the floor.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other samplers using a sieve to distribute the airflow over the Petri dish have sieves with more holes: 394 holes in the Samplair AES (Nesa et al, 2001), 400 holes in the Andersen (1958) sampler, 401 holes in the SAS Sampler (Lach, 1985), and 657 holes in the Bio Samp MBS-100 Midore Azen (Shintani et al, 2004). Sieve impaction is based on the aspiration of air through small holes at the top of the sampler.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%