2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the Sumy nuclear microprobe with the integrated probe-forming system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such approach has been described in detail in [11]. For numerical simulation, parameters of PFS of the IAP NASU nuclear scanning microprobe [13,14] were taken. Protons with energy 1 MeV and momentum spread of d max = 10 À3 were taken for calculation.…”
Section: Beam Focusing Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such approach has been described in detail in [11]. For numerical simulation, parameters of PFS of the IAP NASU nuclear scanning microprobe [13,14] were taken. Protons with energy 1 MeV and momentum spread of d max = 10 À3 were taken for calculation.…”
Section: Beam Focusing Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple program code was used to obtain a theoretical profile of SEE and to modulate a scanning procedure of a semi-infinite plate edge with specified current density distribution (Fig. 3) [14].…”
Section: Beam Focusing Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the yy' phase plane we used the same scheme rotated by 90°. The direct current measurements were performed using a current integrator described in [3]. The averaged current distribution is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Deconvolution Of the Beam Brightness Distribution Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of particles in a pixel on the target is N = I/(f Á q) where q is the ion charge and f is the beam scanning frequency. All particles are distributed randomly in the phase space under the hypersurface b(x, y, x 0 , y 0 ) specified by the distribution (1) and parameters (3). To do this, the reject method described in [4] was used.…”
Section: Beam Dynamics Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation