2009
DOI: 10.1243/09544119jeim680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the resurfaced hip. Part 2: The influence of prosthesis stem design on remodelling and fracture of the femoral neck

Abstract: Hip Resurfacing is a popular treatment for osteoarthritis in young, active patients. Previous studies have shown that occasional failures-femoral neck fracture and implant loosening, possibly associated with bone adaptation-are affected by prosthesis sizing and positioning, in addition to patient and surgical factors.Aiming to improve tolerance to surgical variation, Finite Element modelling was used to indicate the effects of prosthesis metaphyseal stem design on bone remodelling and femoral neck fracture, wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most commonly, these studies produced a static FE model of the intact and resurfaced joints and used the comparative mechanical strain or strain energy density (SED) in the two situations to predict the immediately post-operative remodelling stimulus (Watanabe et al 2000;Ong et al 2006Ong et al , 2009Taylor 2006;Taylor 2007a, 2007b;Dickinson et al 2010aDickinson et al , 2010b. These studies have presented predictions of stress shielded bone within the femoral head and the superior femoral neck, with bone densification around the prosthesis stem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most commonly, these studies produced a static FE model of the intact and resurfaced joints and used the comparative mechanical strain or strain energy density (SED) in the two situations to predict the immediately post-operative remodelling stimulus (Watanabe et al 2000;Ong et al 2006Ong et al , 2009Taylor 2006;Taylor 2007a, 2007b;Dickinson et al 2010aDickinson et al , 2010b. These studies have presented predictions of stress shielded bone within the femoral head and the superior femoral neck, with bone densification around the prosthesis stem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have presented predictions of stress shielded bone within the femoral head and the superior femoral neck, with bone densification around the prosthesis stem. They allow the comparative performance of different surgical and implant design variables to be predicted, such as prosthesis position (Radcliffe and Taylor 2007a;Ong et al 2009;Dickinson et al 2010a) and sizing (Dickinson et al 2010a), fixation methods (Ong et al 2006;Radcliffe and Taylor 2007b), stem diameter (Taylor 2006), stem length (Dickinson et al 2010b) and the extent of stem -bone contact (Taylor 2006;Ong et al 2009). However, these results only represent the driving force for bone remodelling at one instant and do not predict the progression or end point of the nonlinear process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A shorter stem was also shown to offer improved tolerance toward misalignment and bone remodeling stimulus in a previous study. 30 Besides of a shortened stem, an increase of its thickness and the transitional radius were shown to increase the tolerated bending moment. However, it has to be noted that the femoral head preparation for a thicker stem could weaken the mechanical strength of the native femoral head, which may lead to early resorption or collapse of the femoral head.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present analyses and tests were limited to the mechanical fracture strength of the prosthesis and its interface with the cement mantle. Previous research has predicted reduced remodelling stimulus and femoral neck fracture risk for the proposed short-stemmed prosthesis geometry [25, 35, 36], so the behaviour of the supporting bone was not considered in these tests. Contemporary ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in THR also demonstrate excellent in vivo performance with regard to reduced osteolysis [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%