2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the new ‘Eurofever/PRINTO classification criteria’ in FMF patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between the new criteria and the earlier one is the inclusion of patient genotype. Sag et al ( 41 ) reported that this new set of criteria is more sensitive (96%) and less specific (73.1%) than Tel Hashomer and Yalcinkaya-Ozen criteria.…”
Section: Familial Mediterranean Fevermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The main difference between the new criteria and the earlier one is the inclusion of patient genotype. Sag et al ( 41 ) reported that this new set of criteria is more sensitive (96%) and less specific (73.1%) than Tel Hashomer and Yalcinkaya-Ozen criteria.…”
Section: Familial Mediterranean Fevermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The patients were diagnosed using the Tel-Hashomer criteria. 13 The findings were recorded on the basis of major criteria (recurrent febrile episodes with serositis, amyloidosis of the AA type, favorable response to colchicine) and minor criteria (recurrent febrile episodes, erysipelas-like erythema, FMF in a first-degree relative). MEFV gene screening of the patients was carried out in the second, third, fifth and tenth exon by two different methods: Reverse hybridization strip assay (Vienna Lab, FMF StripAssay, GMBH, Austria) and pyrosequencing (PyroMark, Qiagen, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of three clinical FMF diagnostic criteria and the new Eurofever/PRINTO classification criteria was recently tested in a real-life setting on paediatric patients. All of the criteria sets revealed similar performance in diagnosing or classifying patients with biallelic pathogenic variants, but the Eurofever/PRINTO classification criteria had a somewhat lower sensitivity for patients with monoallelic variants (heterozygotes) [78,79].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 96%