2016
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment and Multidimensional Prognostic Index in predicting negative outcomes in older adults with cancer

Abstract: The Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment (MGA) is currently used for assessing geriatric oncological patients, but a new prognostic index ‐ the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) ‐ has a demonstrated prognostic value in cancer patients too. The present work was designed to compare the MPI and MGA as predictors of 12‐month mortality. 160 patients ≥70 years old with locally‐advanced or metastatic solid cancers consecutively joining our Geriatric Oncology Program were administered a Comprehensive Geriatric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite several studies have been performed, current multidimensional instruments are not adequate to extensively stratify the risk for hospitalization and mortality in old people since influenced by different comorbidities and factors. Indeed, a considerable limit of these frailty scales is that different tools have been shown to be only effective in specific clinical conditions or settings (e.g., HF, cancer, or dementia; population-level frailty screening versus clinical screening) and, so far, no assessment scale is applicable to every elderly patient (83, 84, 86, 87). …”
Section: Mirnas In Cardiovascular Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite several studies have been performed, current multidimensional instruments are not adequate to extensively stratify the risk for hospitalization and mortality in old people since influenced by different comorbidities and factors. Indeed, a considerable limit of these frailty scales is that different tools have been shown to be only effective in specific clinical conditions or settings (e.g., HF, cancer, or dementia; population-level frailty screening versus clinical screening) and, so far, no assessment scale is applicable to every elderly patient (83, 84, 86, 87). …”
Section: Mirnas In Cardiovascular Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MPI then differs from other mortality indexes because it is based on a CGA, with each of the eight tests assessing one geriatric domain. Giantin and collaborators confirmed the good discriminatory power for 12-month mortality in a cohort of 160 cancer patients older than 70, and validated higher mortality prediction compared to a standard CGA [13]. Use of the MPI in clinical practice may provide a rapid and comprehensive evaluation of patients, to adapt the decisionmaking in oncology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…CGA has also shown a predictive value in identifying elderly patients with cancer who are exposed to a poor prognosis, including a higher risk of death during hospitalization [11]. Among the CGA-based assessment tools, the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) has shown a predictive interest in mortality at six months and 12 months in Italian patients aged 70 years and older with advanced cancers [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CGA has also shown predictive value in identifying elderly patients with cancer who are exposed to a poor prognosis, including a higher risk of death during hospitalization [11]. Among the CGAbased assessment tools, the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) has shown a predictive interest in mortality at 6 months and 12 months in Italian patients aged 70 years and older with advanced cancers [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%