2003
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/16/10/314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the magnetron sputtering apparatus equipped with 60 mm  superconducting bulk magnet

Abstract: The performance of the planar magnetron sputtering apparatus with the use of a c-axis oriented single-domain Sm123 bulk superconductor with 60 mm in diameter is discussed. A high magnetic field of 4.2 T at the surface of the superconductor coupled with a high electric field of maximum 6 kV enabled us to discharge even at the Ar gas pressure of 1 × 10−3 Pa. A target-to-substrate distance could be extended to 30 mm under low pressures of 10−2–10−3 Pa to allow the deposition with an incidence angle normal to a su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a practical application of REBaCuO bulk superconductors (RE: rare-earth element or yttrium), a highstrength superconducting bulk magnet has been intensively developed by pulse-field magnetization (PFM) as well as the conventional field-cooled magnetization (FCM). 1) The trapped field B T P obtained by PFM was, however, considerably smaller than that attained by FCM below 77 K due to the large temperature rise (ÁT) caused by the dynamical motion of the magnetic fluxes. 2) Several approaches have been successfully performed to enhance B T P including an iteratively magnetizing pulsed-field method with reducing amplitude (IMRA) 3) and a multipulse technique with stepwise cooling (MPSC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As a practical application of REBaCuO bulk superconductors (RE: rare-earth element or yttrium), a highstrength superconducting bulk magnet has been intensively developed by pulse-field magnetization (PFM) as well as the conventional field-cooled magnetization (FCM). 1) The trapped field B T P obtained by PFM was, however, considerably smaller than that attained by FCM below 77 K due to the large temperature rise (ÁT) caused by the dynamical motion of the magnetic fluxes. 2) Several approaches have been successfully performed to enhance B T P including an iteratively magnetizing pulsed-field method with reducing amplitude (IMRA) 3) and a multipulse technique with stepwise cooling (MPSC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As a superconducting bulk magnet, we employed the Ø60 mm c-axis oriented single-domain Sm123 bulk superconductor synthesized in the oxygen-controlled melt-growth (OCMG) method by adding 20 wt% Ag 2 O and 0.5 wt% Pt to the powders mixed with the ratio Sm123:Sm211 = 3:1 [5][6][7][8][9]. In the present work, however, the two Gd123 bulks of 60 mm in diameter were purchased from Nippon-Steel Co.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mizutani et al [5][6][7][8][9][10] constructed a superconducting magnetron sputtering apparatus by installing the magnetized bulk superconductor in place of the Nd-Fe-B permanent magnet. A bulk superconductor cooled by a refrigerator down to about 30 K was magnetized and subsequently inserted below a target plate in order to confine the plasma immediately above it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A superconducting magnetron sputtering apparatus was constructed by installing the magnetized bulk superconductor in place of the Nd-Fe-B permanent magnet [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. It can capture much denser plasma over the target than a conventional magnetron sputtering as a result of the generation of an extremely strong magnetic field by the magnetized bulk superconductor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can capture much denser plasma over the target than a conventional magnetron sputtering as a result of the generation of an extremely strong magnetic field by the magnetized bulk superconductor. The degree of plasma confinement has been evaluated by using a parameter B max == , magnetic field being defined on the target as that directed parallel to its surface and, hence, possessing a vanishing vertical or z-component [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%