Abstract:The financial sector reforms, role of regulatory authorities and increase in savings attracted investors towards mutual funds. Stock market developments created popularity for equity oriented schemes. In the face of availability of multitudinous schemes, growth schemes introduced in the year 1993 has been studied. Sharpe, Treynor, Jensen and Fama's measures reveals that all the seven schemes showed negative risk premium, scheme s performance was in line with that of market performance, existence of a high degr… Show more
“…Table 4 clearly reveals that "Experienced fund management" team has the highest mean (4.68) followed by "Quality of service" (4.51) and "Suitability of product" (4.42) as the most important attribute responsible for success of mutual fund. Analogous to this was findings of (Lakshmi, 2012;Mehta, 2011;Goel, 2012) Hence it can be said that the respondent brokers consider that in order to make a mutual fund success the most important factor is experienced fund management team and quality of service and the least important factors are "Brand value of AMC" (3.96) and "Number of service centers" (3.7800) (Gozbasi and Citak, 2010). The gamma correlations between attributes made it clear that suitability of product and experienced fund management team are highly correlated and hence can be said that these are two major attributes affecting success of mutual funds.…”
Section: Table 4: Attributes Affecting Success Of Mutual Fundsmentioning
The past years have been a defining period for the mutual fund industry, as lack of incentivisation has made it increasingly burdensome for the distributor to reach out to the retail investor. Rather, role of distribution channel is phenomenal in delivery of product or service. Majority of the investors relies on financial advisors for choosing mutual funds. Hence, it is imperative to unveil the factors considered while selecting mutual funds and attributes affecting success of mutual funds. It is a maiden effort in this regard, since no such empirical study as per best of our knowledge has been conducted in the state of Punjab till date.
“…Table 4 clearly reveals that "Experienced fund management" team has the highest mean (4.68) followed by "Quality of service" (4.51) and "Suitability of product" (4.42) as the most important attribute responsible for success of mutual fund. Analogous to this was findings of (Lakshmi, 2012;Mehta, 2011;Goel, 2012) Hence it can be said that the respondent brokers consider that in order to make a mutual fund success the most important factor is experienced fund management team and quality of service and the least important factors are "Brand value of AMC" (3.96) and "Number of service centers" (3.7800) (Gozbasi and Citak, 2010). The gamma correlations between attributes made it clear that suitability of product and experienced fund management team are highly correlated and hence can be said that these are two major attributes affecting success of mutual funds.…”
Section: Table 4: Attributes Affecting Success Of Mutual Fundsmentioning
The past years have been a defining period for the mutual fund industry, as lack of incentivisation has made it increasingly burdensome for the distributor to reach out to the retail investor. Rather, role of distribution channel is phenomenal in delivery of product or service. Majority of the investors relies on financial advisors for choosing mutual funds. Hence, it is imperative to unveil the factors considered while selecting mutual funds and attributes affecting success of mutual funds. It is a maiden effort in this regard, since no such empirical study as per best of our knowledge has been conducted in the state of Punjab till date.
“… The study finds that there is no significance difference between age and avenues of maximum investment. The study finds that there is no significance difference between educational qualification and annual investment [6]. The study finds that there is significance difference between annual income and annual investment.…”
This research investigates the investment habits of farmers in Antharam, Ranga Reddy District, shedding light on the economic decisions that shape agricultural practices in the region. Agriculture, being a pivotal sector in the district, is influenced by various factors, and understanding the investment behavior of farmers is crucial for sustainable rural development. The study employs a comprehensive research design that combines surveys, interviews, and on-site observations to capture the nuances of farmers' investment preferences, risk perceptions, and decision-making processes.
“…Ananda and Murugaiah (2006) evaluated 113 Indian mutual funds schemes having exposure of 90 percent of corpus to equity stocks of 25 funds. Lakshmi, Deo, and Murugesan (2008) examine that the performance of selected growth schemes which reveals all seven schemes showed the negative risk premium. Arugaslan, Edwards, and Samant (2008) evaluated 50 large US-based international equity funds using risk-adjusted returns found results indicate that funds with the highest average returns may lose their investors attraction once the degree of risk fixed into the funds is forced into the analysis.…”
This research paper inspects the comparative performance evaluation of banks sponsored Indian mutual funds using traditional measure. The data comprises 166 open-ended equity, debt, liquid and equity linked saving schemes (tax savings) schemes during the period of April 2006–March 2017. The evidence shows that all sample schemes are well diversified. Public sector banks sponsored get first ranked because good return, all positive and diversified schemes and efficient performance of portfolio management as compared to Private sector and UTI banks sponsored mutual funds.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.