2007
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.24.003037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the holographic multivergence target in the subjective measurement of spherical refractive error and amplitude of accommodation of the human eye

Abstract: We recently suggested the use of a holographic multivergence target to measure the spherical refractive error and the amplitude of accommodation of the human eye [K. V. Avudainayagam and C. S. Avudainayagam, Opt. Lett.28, 123 (2003)]. In this paper we report the performance of the holographic target in measuring real eyes. The holographic technique compared well with subjective refraction and autorefraction in the measurement of spherical refractive error. The performance of the holographic technique in measur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the distance corrected vision through the logMAR hologram is worse for younger hyperopes as compared with the older hyperopes, this seems to suggest that the latent hyperopia is in play when hyperopic subjects view through the logMAR hologram. This is consistent with our initial findings reported in our earlier paper 10 that it may be possible to get a measure of hyperopia without the intervention of latent accommodation using the multivergence hologram. Table 12 also lists the Pearson correlation coefficient between the pupil size and the logMAR value for various refractive groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the distance corrected vision through the logMAR hologram is worse for younger hyperopes as compared with the older hyperopes, this seems to suggest that the latent hyperopia is in play when hyperopic subjects view through the logMAR hologram. This is consistent with our initial findings reported in our earlier paper 10 that it may be possible to get a measure of hyperopia without the intervention of latent accommodation using the multivergence hologram. Table 12 also lists the Pearson correlation coefficient between the pupil size and the logMAR value for various refractive groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…10 In this measurement, an uncorrected eye viewing a distant fixation target in white light is presented briefly (in flashes of about 1 s duration) with the multivergence hologram and the most positive number seen clearly by the subject gives a measure of his/her refractive error. 10 When a spectacle corrected eye is presented with such a multivergence hologram in total darkness, we believe that the clearest number seen would give a measure of his/her dark focus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%