2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40729-019-0197-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants

Abstract: Background: The application of the counter-torque technique has been proposed as a conservative and atraumatic alternative for the explantation of nonmobile dental implants. The objective of this report is to assess the performance of this technique in a large number of patients. Results: Three hundred and fifty-five patients were treated for the explantation of 749 nonmobile dental implants. The explantations were performed by the application of counter-torque to break the bone-implant interface. Successful i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, efforts are being made to determine how BMSC are subsequently integrated to form the correct cell configuration and able to differentiate, repair and recapitulate the functional skeletal tissue and how mechanical loading is exerted upon the MSC engineered bone [ 42 ]. Another consideration is to improve/restore or modulate the diseased or disrupted microenvironment prior to the commencement of the regenerative therapy, to ensure greater efficacy in skeletal repair [ 43 ]. Furthermore, a permissive vascular environment is imperative for bone formation, where vascular supply assists in bone regeneration by mitigating hypoxic conditions and necrosis within the scaffold, in addition to the strong coupling between angiogenesis and osteogenesis.…”
Section: Skeletal Tissue Regeneration—advancements Over the Last Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, efforts are being made to determine how BMSC are subsequently integrated to form the correct cell configuration and able to differentiate, repair and recapitulate the functional skeletal tissue and how mechanical loading is exerted upon the MSC engineered bone [ 42 ]. Another consideration is to improve/restore or modulate the diseased or disrupted microenvironment prior to the commencement of the regenerative therapy, to ensure greater efficacy in skeletal repair [ 43 ]. Furthermore, a permissive vascular environment is imperative for bone formation, where vascular supply assists in bone regeneration by mitigating hypoxic conditions and necrosis within the scaffold, in addition to the strong coupling between angiogenesis and osteogenesis.…”
Section: Skeletal Tissue Regeneration—advancements Over the Last Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods developed to recruit endogenous BMSC and deliver exogenous BMSC systemically or locally ( Figure 1 ) include cell-free strategies, magnetic cell labeling and tissue specific targeting, aptamer-nanoparticles, small bioactive molecules, injectable agents, the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or bone marrow aspirates, BMSC secreted exosomes, and bio-engineered scaffold approaches, including three dimensional (3D) bioprinting (bioinks) [ 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Skeletal Tissue Regeneration—advancements Over the Last Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the foregoing [ 30 ], our workgroup would like to propose a protocol for OLP treatment and monitoring when rehabilitated with dental implants ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of the K-wire was checked by x-ray immediately after surgery and during the follow-up. An osteointegration score modified from Das et al [ 11 ] was used to evaluate the macroscopic and radiographic changes in soft tissue swelling, implant movement, surface irregularities, hyperplastic growth/periosteal reactions, and peri-implant bone radiolucency. Each parameter was scored from 0 (no changes) to 3 (severe changes).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSM inhibits bacterial adherence due to a modified surface chemistry or surface topography [ 9 ]. In general, hydrophilic surface conditions [ 10 ], structured surface topography [ 11 ] and porous structures [ 12 ] can enhance the osteointegration of the implant. Laser surface treatments for improved osteointegration are the state of the art, but these differ in terms of the details of the respective surface topographies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%