2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-016-2284-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the Bard Scoring System in Bariatric Surgery Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Abstract: The BARD score is still not ideal for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, hepatitis, and fibrosis, but it was proved to be effective in the detection of absence of liver fibrosis in a bariatric population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the other composite scores, the suggested cutoff of 1.0 for APRI resulted in high specificity but poor sensitivity, making it useful only as a rule-in test ( 45 ). BARD had the lowest AUROC and had low specificity, mirroring previous findings in obese individuals ( 21 ). These considerations support use of ADAPT or the inexpensive FIB-4, which has limitations regarding its use of 2 cutoffs, as first-line tests in obese individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Regarding the other composite scores, the suggested cutoff of 1.0 for APRI resulted in high specificity but poor sensitivity, making it useful only as a rule-in test ( 45 ). BARD had the lowest AUROC and had low specificity, mirroring previous findings in obese individuals ( 21 ). These considerations support use of ADAPT or the inexpensive FIB-4, which has limitations regarding its use of 2 cutoffs, as first-line tests in obese individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The general profile of the patients was as expected for a population that undergoes bariatric surgery through the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS): 91.36% female, average age was 45.55 years and average prior BMI was 42.93 kg/m². The low proportion of SG (12.35%) compared to RYGB is also found at SUS 14,15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Positive predictive values were progressively lower as higher scores were assigned (VLS 0-1 = 68.59% preperfusion and 68.8% postperfusion; VLS 2-3 = 33.82% preperfusion and 32% postperfusion; VLS ≥4 = 3.7% preperfusion and 3.12% postperfusion), suggesting a trend toward overrating the severity of NAFLD when there is a worse perception of macroscopic findings. 23 Although the VLS was proposed to increase the ectoscopy precision when evaluating NAFLD, incorrect analysis of severity was still frequent, with the immediate result of organ disposal; all 4 evaluators classified viable grafts as unviable at some point (preperfusion or postperfusion). This is the same obstacle faced when a nonstandardized visual analysis is performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%