Performance of Sugarcane (<i>Saccharum officinarum</i> L.) Under Surface Drip, Sub Surface Drip (Biwall) and Furrow Methods of Irrigation

Ramesh, P.; Kailasam, C.; Srinivasan, T.

doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.1994.tb00173.x

Cited by 11 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar trend was noticed in number of millable canes and commercial cane sugar. Ramesh et al (1994) also reported that drip irrigation gave higher cane yield than furrow irrigation based on IW: CPE ratio.…”

Section: Performance Of Drip and Surface Irrigationmentioning

confidence: 93%

Effect of crop geometry and drip irrigation levels on sugarcane in South Saurashtra region of India

Kumawat

Kacha

Dahima

2016

IJARe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An experiment was conducted to study the effect of crop geometry and irrigation levels on sugarcane under drip irrigation at Main Sugarcane Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Kodinar during 2011-14. The treatment consisted of three crop geometry (90 cm normal planting, paired row planting (60: 90 cm) and paired row planting (60: 120 cm) and three drip irrigation levels (0.5 PEF, 0.7 PEF and 0.9 PEF) and with an extra treatment (control) having surface irrigation (90 cm) at 1.0 IW/CPE ratio. Experimental results indicated that paired row (60: 90 cm) planting gave significantly higher cane yield (101.04 t/ha) over 60: 120 cm paired row planting (88.82 t/ha) and remained at par with 90 cm row spacing (97.34 t/ha). Drip irrigation level of 0.9 PEF gave significantly higher cane yield (108.63 t/ha) over 0.7 PEF (96.01 t/ha) and 0.5 PEF (82.56 t/ha). Juice quality parameters like brix, sucrose, purity and sugar recovery percent were not affected significantly due to either crop geometry or different drip irrigation levels. Significantly higher cane yield was recorded under drip irrigation (95.74 t/ha) compared to surface irrigation (76.86 t/ha). The total water use was not affected due to different crop geometries. Water use decreased constantly in 0.7 and 0.5 PEF compared to 0.9 PEF and accordingly WUE increased.

show abstract

Section: Performance Of Drip and Surface Irrigationmentioning

confidence: 93%

Effect of crop geometry and drip irrigation levels on sugarcane in South Saurashtra region of India

Kumawat

Kacha

Dahima

2016

IJARe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A resposta de produtividade da cana-de-açúcar irrigada depende de um conjunto de fatores, dentre eles: da quantidade de água e de fertilizantes aplicados (Thorburn et al, 2003;Dantas Neto et al, 2006), do manejo de irrigação (Ramesh et al, 1994), da cultivar, idade de corte e do tipo de solo e do clima (Ramesh & Mahadevaswamy, 2000;Smit & Singels, 2006). Portanto, o presente trabalho teve como objetivo estudar o efeito da tecnologia de irrigação por gotejamento, em diferentes cultivares de cana-de-açúcar, em dois ciclos de produção (cana--planta e cana-soca).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Produtividade de três cultivares de cana-de-açúcar sob manejos de sequeiro e irrigado por gotejamento

Gava¹,

Silva²,

Silva

et al. 2011

Rev. bras. eng. agríc. ambient.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ciclo teve duração de 336 dias, ocorrendo precipitação de 1.480 mm. O volume de água disponibilizado pelo sistema de irrigação por gotejamento foi de 400 mm, totalizando 1.880 mm. O segundo ciclo teve duração de 365 dias, cujo volume de água por meio de precipitação foi de 1.394 mm; somados aos 320 mm fornecidos pelo sistema de irrigação, totalizaram 1.714 mm. Ocorreu interação entre manejo e cultivar para as variáveis: produtividade de colmos (TCH) e produtividade de açúcar (TPH) em que a maior diferença foi observada para a cultivar SP80-3280. As cultivares apresentaram respostas diferenciadas na eficiência de utilização da água. No manejo irrigado por gotejamento houve elevação de 24% na produtividade de colmos e de 23% na produtividade de açúcar, em relação ao manejo de sequeiro.Palavras-chave: Saccharum spp., disponibilidade hídrica, irrigação, produção Productivity of three sugarcane cultivars under dry and drip irrigated management ABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate the effect of drip irrigation technology in different sugarcane varieties in two crop cycles (plant cane and ratoon). The experimental design was in completly randomized blocks, in split-plot with four replications, constituted by three sugarcane genotypes: RB867515; RB855536 and SP80-3280 and two crop management: drip irrigation system and rainfed system, totalizing six treatments. The first cycle lasted for 336 days, with rainfall of 1,480 mm. The volume of water provided by the system of drip irrigation was 400 mm, totaling 1,880 mm. The second cycle lasted for 365 days, the volume of water through rainfall was 1,394 mm, added to 320 mm provided by the system of irrigation, totaled 1,714 mm. Interaction between management and cultivars was found significant for the variables: productivity of stalks (TCH) and sugar yield (TPH), in which the largest difference was observed for cultivar SP80-3280. There was significant response to drip irrigation, on average the increase of production of stalks and sugar was 24 and 23%, respectively.

show abstract

“…With good management practices, deficit irrigation can result in substantial water savings with little impact on the quality and quantity of the yield in cotton (Kirda 2002) and soya bean (Sincik et al 2008). A number of previous studies reported the advantage of drip irrigation methods in terms of high WUE and yield for different crops including cotton (Mateos et al 1991, Weerathaworn et al 1992, Abu-Awwad 1994, Ramesh et al 1994, Dagdelen et al 2006, Ibragimov et al 2007, El-Hendawy et al 2008.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Deficit Drip Irrigation Ratios on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Fibre Quality

Başal

Dağdelen

Ünay

et al. 2009

J Agronomy Crop Science

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increasing irrigation costs and declining water availability compel producers to adapt irrigation strategies for maximum crop yield and water use efficiency. A field trial was conducted to observe the effects of various drip irrigation ratios (IR‐0, IR‐25, IR‐50, IR‐75 and IR‐100) on water use efficiency (WUE), the irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), lint yield, yield components and fibre quality at two upland cotton varieties during 2004 and 2005. WUE was found to increase from 0.62 to 0.71 kg m−3 as the irrigation water applied was reduced from 100 % to 75 % of soil water depletion. Deficit irrigation of cotton with drip irrigation at 75 % treatment level (IR‐75) did not decrease seed cotton yield and yield components during 2 years, with the exception of the number of bolls in 2005. Among fibre quality parameters, no significant differences in fibre length, fineness, uniformity index and elongation were detected between the 100 % and 75 % irrigation levels in 2005. The results revealed that irrigation of cotton with a drip irrigation method at 75 % level had significant benefits in terms of saved irrigation water without reducing yield, and high WUE indicated a definitive advantage of employing deficit irrigation under limited water supply conditions.

show abstract

Performance of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Under Surface Drip, Sub Surface Drip (Biwall) and Furrow Methods of Irrigation

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

Effect of crop geometry and drip irrigation levels on sugarcane in South Saurashtra region of India

Effect of crop geometry and drip irrigation levels on sugarcane in South Saurashtra region of India

Produtividade de três cultivares de cana-de-açúcar sob manejos de sequeiro e irrigado por gotejamento

Effects of Deficit Drip Irrigation Ratios on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Fibre Quality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About