2020
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Standardized Relative CBV for Quantifying Regional Histologic Tumor Burden in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: Comparison against Normalized Relative CBV Using Image-Localized Stereotactic Biopsies

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Perfusion MR imaging measures of relative CBV can distinguish recurrent tumor from posttreatment radiation effects in high-grade gliomas. Currently, relative CBV measurement requires normalization based on user-defined reference tissues. A recently proposed method of relative CBV standardization eliminates the need for user input. This study compares the predictive performance of relative CBV standardization against relative CBV normalization for quantifying recurrent tumor burden in hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(105 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential of FTB to predict response to treatment ( 61 ) and to distinguish between tumor or treatment effect, as confirmed by histopathologic examination of resected tissue samples ( 62 ), has been demonstrated. More recently, a prospective study ( 63 ) using image-localized biopsy tissue validated the ability of rCBV to predict tumor content (0–100%), demonstrating similar performance of nRCBV and sRCBV for the creation of FTB. Given that sRCBV does not require choosing a reference ROI, this represents an important step toward workflow optimization for the creation of FTB maps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The potential of FTB to predict response to treatment ( 61 ) and to distinguish between tumor or treatment effect, as confirmed by histopathologic examination of resected tissue samples ( 62 ), has been demonstrated. More recently, a prospective study ( 63 ) using image-localized biopsy tissue validated the ability of rCBV to predict tumor content (0–100%), demonstrating similar performance of nRCBV and sRCBV for the creation of FTB. Given that sRCBV does not require choosing a reference ROI, this represents an important step toward workflow optimization for the creation of FTB maps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although NAWM normalization techniques are popular for nrCBV, it is worth mentioning other normalization approaches applied in some other studies. For example, there has also been interest in the automatic normalization, or "standardization," of rCBV parametric maps by transforming rCBV values to a standardized scale, precluding the need for manual NAWM ROIs [1,[14][15][16]. Standardization of rCBV has been shown to reduce variability compared to manual NAWM methods [1,14,15], though standardized rCBV metrics had similar performance with NAWM-based nrCBV metrics for assessing post-treatment tumor burden in stereotactic biopsy samples of recurrent high-grade glioma [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common normalization methods include placing a reference region of interest (ROI) on the contralateral normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), but numerous regions have been reported such as the white matter directly opposite to the tumor [3][4][5], the posterior limb of the internal capsule [6], the temporal lobe [7], and the centrum semiovale [8][9][10][11][12] along with variations in the placement of a single ROI [9] or multiple ROIs anteriorly to posteriorly [10,11,13]. Automated normalization methods, such as Gaussian-normalized nrCBV [1] and "standardized" nrCBV involving training-set data [1,[14][15][16], have also been described, but these methods require advanced software that limits their clinical feasibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creation of FTB maps is based on previous studies validating the rCBV threshold used to distinguish high-grade brain tumor from treatment effect for the creation of FTB. More recent studies demonstrated the relevance of FTB to predict outcomes 5–7 and guide clinical decisions. 8 Introduced here is the idea that FTB can likewise be useful for guiding surgery and diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%