2019
DOI: 10.3389/fams.2019.00043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Some Estimators of Relative Variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this criterion, all seven genes were suitable reference genes according to NormFinder. This result is supported by the distribution of C q values, which indicated that all seven candidate genes were stably expressed with CV values < 1, which is considered to indicate low variance 28 . In BestKeeper analysis, all seven genes were also determined to be appropriate reference genes for analysis of honey bee gene expression in summer, autumn and among the three tissue types as indicated by SD values < 1 22,23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Based on this criterion, all seven genes were suitable reference genes according to NormFinder. This result is supported by the distribution of C q values, which indicated that all seven candidate genes were stably expressed with CV values < 1, which is considered to indicate low variance 28 . In BestKeeper analysis, all seven genes were also determined to be appropriate reference genes for analysis of honey bee gene expression in summer, autumn and among the three tissue types as indicated by SD values < 1 22,23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The coefficient of variation (CV) is a standardized, dimensionless measure of dispersion relative to a data set's average. It enables the comparison of several datasets on genotypes with different units of measurement (Ospina and Marmolejo-Ramos 2019). It is also used as a measure to compare the robustness of different biological traits (Félix and Barkoulas 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, CV is adopted to quantify the variability of muscle rhythmic activation during walking in three different populations, namely hemiplegic children, healthy school children and young adult. Motivation for choosing the CV is threefold: (i) We aim for applying and testing this index in the evaluation of sEMG variability during walking in hemiplegic children for the first time at our best knowledge; (ii) we aim for checking the suitability of such an easy-to-compute index in reflecting different characteristics between pathological and control children and then between children and young adults, in order to promote the adoption of sEMG in clinical practice: Despite its simplicity, the index is able to satisfactorily discriminate the muscular recruitment during walking exhibited by different populations [14,28]; (iii) CV is a unit-free measure, suitable to compare normally distributed data by directly quantifying the degree of variability relative to the mean of the distributions [28]. The CV index, indeed, is not directly computed on sEMG samples, but it is derived from the standard deviation of the signal, which is by definition a direct measurement of the signal variability.…”
Section: Indices For Semg Variability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics seem to make this index more suitable to the aim of the present study, respect to CQV and VR indices. CQV index, indeed, depends on mean and quartiles, which in turn can be influenced by how they are estimated [28]. VR index, requiring a more articulated computation algorithm, is more indicated for intra-individual variability, being insensitive to mean sEMG amplitude and data smoothing applied to different waveforms [29].…”
Section: Indices For Semg Variability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%