2018
DOI: 10.1002/clen.201700670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Soil Cation Exchange Capacity Pedotransfer Function as Affected by the Inputs and Database Size

Abstract: Cation exchange capacity (CEC) have diverse applications from soil classification and management to agricultural/environmental simulations. Direct measurement of CEC is difficult. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of calibration dataset size on accuracy and validity of soil CEC pedotransfer functions (PTFs) derived for selected arid–semi arid soils. Furthermore, the effect of the type of inputs on performance of the PTFs is evaluated. The soil organic carbon content along with either soi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Widely accepted knowledge demonstrates that soils can buffer exogenous acid input by means of multiple mechanisms derived from various processes [4,13]. Soil exchangeable cations, which greatly depend on soil pH, SOM, and clay [32][33][34], can exchange with exogenously input H + to mitigate its effect on the soil acidity. Therefore, positive linear relationships between the soil CEC and acid-buffering capacity have been frequently reported across studies [15,18,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Widely accepted knowledge demonstrates that soils can buffer exogenous acid input by means of multiple mechanisms derived from various processes [4,13]. Soil exchangeable cations, which greatly depend on soil pH, SOM, and clay [32][33][34], can exchange with exogenously input H + to mitigate its effect on the soil acidity. Therefore, positive linear relationships between the soil CEC and acid-buffering capacity have been frequently reported across studies [15,18,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These regions include arid/semi‐arid regions, and many developing nations, where resource constraints limit the number of new measurements that can be made. The accuracy (within‐sample performance) and reliability (agreement with other PTFs in out‐of‐sample estimations) of PTFs largely depend on the number of soil samples used in their construction (Khodaverdiloo et al, 2018; Pachepsky et al, 1998; Pachepsky & Rawls, 1999). A potential response to the need for both local soil information and sufficient sample size is to separate the functional form of the PTF equations obtained from large datasets from the specific value of the coefficients in those equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fooladmand (2008) derived PTF's using multiple linear regression between CEC and soil textural data including sand content, clay content, geometric mean particle-size diameter, the soil particle-size distribution, and soil organic matter content. Several PTF's relating soil CEC with soil's sand, silt or clay fractions, and soil organic carbon content evaluated by (Khodaverdiloo et al, 2018).Scholars took into account of calibration dataset size on the prediction accuracy of soil CEC. These classical pedotransfer function-based approaches often suffer from a high degree of inaccuracy due to spatial scale dependence, non-linear relationships among variables and incompetence to handle mixed data (Van Looy et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%