Performance of regional climate model RegCM4 with a hydrostatic or non‐hydrostatic dynamic core at simulating precipitation extremes in China

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the performance of RegCM4 with a hydrostatic or non‐hydrostatic dynamic core and different land surface models at simulating the mean and extreme precipitation during 1991–1999 in China and the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei urban agglomeration (JJJ) in northern China. The resolutions were 12 km with the whole of China included and 3 km nested over the JJJ region. The observed daily precipitation data comprised the CN05.1 data set from China Meteorological Administration. First, RegCM4 with a hydrostatic dynamic core forced by the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI‐ESM1.2‐HR) that participated in CMIP6 was used to simulate the east Asia area at a resolution of 12 km. Next, the RegCM4 results with 12 km resolution forced RegCM4 with a non‐hydrostatic dynamic core (RegCM4‐NH) to run over the JJJ region with a 3 km convection‐permitting scale through one‐way nesting. The results showed that RegCM4 with a hydrostatic and non‐hydrostatic core could obtain more detailed seasonal and annual precipitation in China and the JJJ region relative to MPI‐ESM1.2‐HR although their performance varied over different regions. RegCM4 with the community land surface model 4.5 (CLM4.5) generally performed better at simulating the mean and extreme precipitation over the four subregions of China than that with the Biosphere–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme because of more detailed descriptions of land surface processes of CLM4.5. RegCM4‐NH with convection‐permitting resolution improved the simulations of heavy precipitation extremes over JJJ compared with RegCM4 with a hydrostatic core and resolution of 12 km. In addition, RegCM4‐NH with CLM4.5 performed better at simulating heavy precipitation extremes over JJJ compared with all other simulations, with higher correlation coefficients and larger relative root mean squared errors.