2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2009.12.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of prototypes for the ALICE electromagnetic calorimeter

Abstract: The performance of prototypes for the ALICE electromagnetic sampling calorimeter has been studied in test beam measurements at FNAL and CERN. A 4 × 4 array of final design modules showed an energy resolution of about 11% / p E(GeV) ⊕ 1.7 % with a uniformity of the response to electrons of 1% and a good linearity in the energy range from 10 to 100 GeV. The electromagnetic shower position resolution was found to be described by 1.5 mm ⊕ 5.3 mm / p E(GeV). For an electron identification efficiency of 90% a hadron… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EMCal [40,41] is a lead/scintillator sampling calorimeter covering |η| < 0.7 in pseudorapidity and 100…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EMCal [40,41] is a lead/scintillator sampling calorimeter covering |η| < 0.7 in pseudorapidity and 100…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each 2 × 2 group of neighboring EMCal towers forms a trigger elementary patch. The energy resolution was measured to be 1.7 ⨁ 11.1= ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi EðGeVÞ p ⨁ 5.1=EðGeVÞ% [46], where ⨁ indicates a sum in quadrature.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The readout of the front end electronics used the standard ALICE data aquisition system. The final results are fully described in details in [8], showing an average light yield of (4.3±0.3) photoelectrons/MeV, a uniformity of the response within 1% for all towers and configurations; a good linearity of the response to electrons above 20 GeV, an only slightly deteriorated energy resolution when using the EMCAL default shaping time of 200 ns compared to 2 μs for PHOS, a position resolution described by 1.5 mm + 5.3 mm / √E (GeV) and a hadron rejection factor > 600 for an electron identification efficiency of 90%. The energy resolution of σ(E) / E = (1.7 ± 0.3) + (11.1 ± 0.4) / √ + (5.1 ± 0.3) / E (where E is in GeV) is shown in Fig.3 (left panel), together with the x and y position resolution as a function of the energy deposit for electrons (right panel).…”
Section: Results From Test Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%