2007
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2006.877101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Power Differential Relay With Adaptive Setting for Line Protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2) Dependability (D): Ratio between total numbers of fault cases predicted to total numbers of actual fault cases. Table III shows the dependability comparison between the proposed scheme and power differential scheme [19] with variations in wind speed for the studied system, including UPFC and wind farm (for 4000 test cases). Here, line to ground (L-G), line to line (L-L), double line to ground (L-L-G), and three phase faults (L-L-L) are taken in to consideration.…”
Section: Performance Assessment and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) Dependability (D): Ratio between total numbers of fault cases predicted to total numbers of actual fault cases. Table III shows the dependability comparison between the proposed scheme and power differential scheme [19] with variations in wind speed for the studied system, including UPFC and wind farm (for 4000 test cases). Here, line to ground (L-G), line to line (L-L), double line to ground (L-L-G), and three phase faults (L-L-L) are taken in to consideration.…”
Section: Performance Assessment and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the fault current contribution of wind turbines with crowbar protected DFIG affects the performance of existing current differential and pilot protection schemes as reported in [6] and [7]. 2) Other types of differential protection schemes available in literature are the power differential protection schemes [18], [19]. In case of wind farm, the wind speed variation results in real power (P) output fluctuation throughout a day [5].…”
Section: Drawbacks Of Conventional Differentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power Differential Protection (PDP) [17] signals a new era for protection schemes, which successfully ensure wide area protection with large contingencies. The PDP based transmission line [18] protection is also well-known among the researchers. On the other hand, Current Differential Protection (CDP) scheme requires phase compensation [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity, selectivity and reliability of the conventional current differential protection are affected and limited by the presence of distributed capacitances along transmission lines, especially in high-voltage long transmission lines [5,6]. These problems are resolved by a newer version of differential protection based on the active and reactive powers measured at the both line ends [7][8][9][10][11]. Power differential protection is a pilot protection scheme introduced to prevent the disadvantages of current differential protection in the presence of capacitive charging current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%