2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of personally worn dosimeters to study non-image forming effects of light: Assessment methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the LightWatchers were worn at chest height. Median deviations of 17% for indoor conditions and 7% for daytime outdoor conditions were reported between the illuminance measurements of the chest and eye position [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the LightWatchers were worn at chest height. Median deviations of 17% for indoor conditions and 7% for daytime outdoor conditions were reported between the illuminance measurements of the chest and eye position [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under all conditions, the sensors measured in the horizontal plane, facing upward. The light loggers were calibrated according to the procedure described in [ 33 ] (see also supplementary material for the calibration procedure). Every 10 s, a measurement was taken and automatically merged into 30-s averages.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retinal light exposure is the dominant synchronizer of the human circadian system 15 . Most wearable light sensors used in research are wrist-worn, prone to sleeve coverage, and do not capture light exposure at eye level 16 . The real-world significance of interindividual differences in light sensitivity is therefore yet to be determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both aspects (measuring person-bound and close to the eye) lead to a more accurate measurement of individual luminous exposure and conclusions drawn based on effects of office lighting on OH will be more correct. Van Duijnhoven et al 64,65 demonstrated the importance of measuring individual luminous exposure by using portable measurement devices and they provided recommendations for selecting the most appropriate measurement device.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%