Performance of Neutron Radiography Systems Using Particle Accelerators

Stokes, J.; Parks, Leo W.; Preskitt, C.A.; Jelonnek, J.

doi:10.1109/tns.1983.4332600

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This result contradicts the systematic presented in Ref. [17], where approximately one order of magnitude is claimed to exist between the yields expected for C and Be targets.…”

Section: Resultscontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…Also, the experimental systematic of yields for ͑d, n͒ reactions in different materials from Ref. [17] can be invoked to predict productions for other kinds of targets by renormalization.…”

Section: Formalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For such purposes, one needs experimental angular distributions at given energies for different types of converters and to elaborate a theoretical tool in order to estimate accurately the characteristics of the secondary neutron beam. In this paper, the experimental results were obtained with 17,20, and 28 MeV deuteron energies on Be, C, and U converters using the time-offlight (TOF) method. These data are compared to results given by a model valid at higher energy in order to obtain pertinent simulations in a large range of incident energies [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Fast neutron forward distributions from C, Be, and U thick targets bombarded by deuterons

Ménard

Mirea²,

Clapier

et al. 1999

Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Measured angular and energetic distributions of neutrons obtained by bombarding Be, C, and U thick targets with 2 H at 17, 20, and 28 MeV incident energies are reported. The data were obtained using the time-of-flight method. The energetic distributions of neutrons were determined at 0 ± , 5 ± , 10 ± , and 20 ± . The data are compared with a modelization based on stripping formalism extended for thick targets.[S1098-4402(99)00029-4] PACS numbers: 29.25.Dz, 25.85.Ec

show abstract

“…This result contradicts the systematic presented in Ref. [17], where approximately one order of magnitude is claimed to exist between the yields expected for C and Be targets.…”

Section: Resultscontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Formalismmentioning

confidence: 99%