2010
DOI: 10.1097/rct.0b013e3181e5d6f7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Multidetector Computed Tomographic Angiography in Determining Surgical Resectability of Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma

Abstract: Multidetector CT angiography offers accurate and valuable preoperative assessment of surgical resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Liver and peritoneal metastases and vascular invasion still remain important pitfalls in preoperative evaluation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies showed that multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has a higher accuracy than endoscopic ultrasonography (US), conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of primary tumors, vascular invasion, and distant metastases, and currently, MDCT is the most important and reliable imaging method for preoperative staging of patients with pancreas adenocarcinoma (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Studies have reported high sensitivity rates, such as 100%, in determining the resectability of pancreas adenocarcinomas with MDCT, but highly variable ranges may be seen for more important parameters, like positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies showed that multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has a higher accuracy than endoscopic ultrasonography (US), conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of primary tumors, vascular invasion, and distant metastases, and currently, MDCT is the most important and reliable imaging method for preoperative staging of patients with pancreas adenocarcinoma (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Studies have reported high sensitivity rates, such as 100%, in determining the resectability of pancreas adenocarcinomas with MDCT, but highly variable ranges may be seen for more important parameters, like positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study evaluating the involvement of the SMA, the CHA, and the celiac trunk with multidetector CT using the traditional criteria of circumferential tumor contact and vessel constriction in 70 pancreatic cancer patients, the sensitivity and specificity were increased from 88 % and 94 % for axial images to 100 % and 93 % for additional multiplanar reconstructions [20]. Other recent studies showed similar results with high accuracy for the assessment of arterial invasion for CT and even for MRI using latest generation devices [10,25,26]. These improvements help to increase the rate of correct indications for and successful completions of open surgery with curative intent in pancreatic cancer patients [27].…”
Section: Arteriesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Variants of hepatic arteries are common and can be relevant because tumor contact can occur at important arteries, which are not where the radiologist and the surgeon expect them to be [26]. Conditions which may lead to impaired arterial blood supply of the liver after pancreatic head resection are, e. g. preexisting severe stenosis of the celiac axis which becomes relevant after cutting off the collateral flow from the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) or accidental injury of an aberrant hepatic artery arising from the SMA behind or -rarely -inside the pancreatic head ( • " Fig.…”
Section: Arterial Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kaneko et al 47 retrospectively compared MDCTA done preoperatively in cases of pancreatic head cancers to the surgical outcomes. In this study, MDCTA was found to have a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of 100%, 71%, 85%, 100%, and 89%, respectively, which was similar to the results reported by Fusari et al 26 and Zamboni et al 48 Results vary according to the various generations of MDCT scanners used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%