19th Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1981
DOI: 10.2514/6.1981-249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of MHD generators with electrode current control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This improves the part-load performance of diagonal generators as discussed at length in Ref. 5. The component ratings of the current controllers are defined by the voltages they sustain and the currents they regulate.…”
Section: Diagonal Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This improves the part-load performance of diagonal generators as discussed at length in Ref. 5. The component ratings of the current controllers are defined by the voltages they sustain and the currents they regulate.…”
Section: Diagonal Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The efficiency due to the current controllers is influenced by the AF loss losses of Fig. 16 and are The efficiency of the consolidation circuits therefore is (5) which is of the order of 92% for the Mk VI generator, obviously higher with larger generators of higher V F .…”
Section: Electrical Configuration Of Mhd Generators Using Consolidatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. 8, it was shown that these current controllers can be connected in a particular way to provide a novel loading scheme for the diagonally connected generator. An MHD generator loaded in such a manner has the advantages of both the Faraday and diagonal configurations, i.e., better part-load performances along with reduced control and power conditioning requirements.…”
Section: Single-load Diagonal Generator With Power Shuffle Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the cumulative ratings of the control, power conditioning, and load-tap consolidation equipment can still be 50% less than the consolidation requirements of a comparable Faraday generator. 8 Since the costs of these equipment depend on their power ratings, considerable savings can be expected over the Faraday configuration. Obviously, DCW generators cannot sustain a voltage difference between anodes and cathodes that are joined by the diagonal frames and hence, are not amenable to this type of current control scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation