2020
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.25176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of pediatric pneumonia in Mozambique and Pakistan

Abstract: Introduction: Improved pneumonia diagnostics are needed in low-resource settings (LRS); lung ultrasound (LUS) is a promising diagnostic technology for pneumonia. The objective was to compare LUS versus chest radiograph (CXR), and among LUS interpreters, to compare expert versus limited training with respect to interrater reliability. Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational study among children with World Health Organization (WHO) Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) chest-indrawing pneu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among children with suspected pneumonia confirmed by chest computed tomography, LUS has demonstrated a sensitivity and accuracy of 0.906 and 0.661, respectively in comparison to CXR which had a sensitivity and accuracy of 0.79 and 0.559, respectively [ 35 ]. Furthermore, LUS expert interpreters have achieved substantially higher interrater reliability compared to CXR expert interpreters [ 43 ]. Without ionizing radiation as a limitation, LUS may be useful to monitor treatment changes and possibly differentiate features of viral versus bacterial pneumonia [ 44 – 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among children with suspected pneumonia confirmed by chest computed tomography, LUS has demonstrated a sensitivity and accuracy of 0.906 and 0.661, respectively in comparison to CXR which had a sensitivity and accuracy of 0.79 and 0.559, respectively [ 35 ]. Furthermore, LUS expert interpreters have achieved substantially higher interrater reliability compared to CXR expert interpreters [ 43 ]. Without ionizing radiation as a limitation, LUS may be useful to monitor treatment changes and possibly differentiate features of viral versus bacterial pneumonia [ 44 – 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods and primary results of this prospective, observational, facility-based cohort study were described previously [ 6 , 7 ]. The primary objective was to provide evidence assessing whether the addition of LUS to current pneumonia care pathways improves identification of pneumonia in children presenting to district hospitals in Manhiça, Mozambique and Karachi, Pakistan.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key to evaluating the use case of LUS in pneumonia diagnosis in resource-constrained settings is a better understanding of the LUS patterns associated with paediatric pneumonia. We conducted a pilot study in Mozambique and Pakistan to investigate use of LUS for diagnosis and found that among children with World Health Organization (WHO) Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) chest-indrawing pneumonia, expert LUS interpreters may achieve substantially higher interrater reliability (IRR) for LUS compared to CXR [ 6 ]. We chose to focus on non-severe chest-indrawing pneumonia rather than more severe pneumonia in this study, since we believed it unlikely that LUS imaging would change initial management of severe pneumonia, which is typically treated with intravenous antibiotics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a well described, portable, inexpensive, and accurate point of care technique to assess respiratory disease at the bedside [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ], with potential deployment in a wide variety of environments [ 8 , 9 ]. In comparison to the traditional methods used to image the lungs, such as a CT scan or chest X-ray, LUS displays comparable or improved diagnostic accuracy at a reduced cost [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%