2023
DOI: 10.1080/00396265.2023.2179910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of low-cost GNSS equipment in monitoring of horizontal displacements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this study identified the smallest displacement values that can be reliably determined with low-cost GNSS equipment as 22.8 mm, 11.7 mm, 8.7 mm, and 4.8 mm for observation periods of 3 h, 6 h, 8 h, and 12 h, respectively. These values closely align with a study conducted by [18] using geodetic GNSS equipment and [27] using PPP method and low-cost GNSS equipment. The consistency of the results suggests that low-cost GNSS equipment can achieve displacement values with a level of accuracy similar to that of geodetic instruments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this study identified the smallest displacement values that can be reliably determined with low-cost GNSS equipment as 22.8 mm, 11.7 mm, 8.7 mm, and 4.8 mm for observation periods of 3 h, 6 h, 8 h, and 12 h, respectively. These values closely align with a study conducted by [18] using geodetic GNSS equipment and [27] using PPP method and low-cost GNSS equipment. The consistency of the results suggests that low-cost GNSS equipment can achieve displacement values with a level of accuracy similar to that of geodetic instruments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Ref. [27] reported that 20 mm displacement can be determined with 6 mm RMSE using the PPP approach based on a 3 h observation period by using low-cost GNSS equipment. Remarkably, similar results were obtained in this study despite the use of low-cost GNSS equipment, demonstrating comparable performance to geodetic GNSS equipment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, about five years ago, u-blox, a Swiss company, released a dual-frequency GNSS receiver, the ZED-F9P, costing approximately USD 200 [19]. The applicability of this receiver, which has the ability to collect observations from all current GNSS satellite constellations, has been tested in different areas [29,30]. Hohensinn et al evaluated the ability of the u-blox ZED-F9P receiver to determine dynamic behavior by using a low-cost and geodetic antenna with the RT-PPP technique and suggested that the ZED-F9P receiver could achieve more successful results with a geodetic antenna [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teknolojik gelişmelerin paralelinde yüksek maliyetli hassas jeodezik donanımlara muadil, çift frekanslı veri toplayabilme özelliğine sahip düşük maliyetli alıcıların üretimiyle (örneğin; İsviçreli çip üreticisi u-blox ZED-F9P GNSS yonga seti) bu alanda PPP üzerine yapılan araştırmalar gittikçe artmaya başlamıştır. Özellikle bu donanımların navigasyon, deformasyonların izlenmesi, atmosferik çalışmalar ve arazi uygulamaları gibi birçok alanda kullanımı son dönemde yaygınlaşmıştır (Nie et al 2020, Xue et al 2021, Ogutcu et al 2023, Oku Topal et al 2023, Yi et al 2021, Stępniak and Paziewski 2022, Wielgocka et al 2021. Ayrıca akıllı telefonlar arasında çift frekans özelliğine sahip cihaz sayısı da gün geçtikçe artmaktadır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified