2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.102107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of laboratory tests for detection for Clostridioides difficile: A multicenter prospective study in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the C. difficile antigen test has better sensitivity, whereas the C. difficile toxin test has better specificity. However, Senoh et al [ 9 ] reported that the sensitivity and specificity of the C. difficile antigen test were 73% and 87%, respectively, which are lower in Japan than in Western countries. In addition, Deshpande et al [ 19 ] reported that among patients diagnosed with CDI who were positive for the C. difficile toxin, results were positive in the second (2.7%) and third tests (2.3%) despite a negative first test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the C. difficile antigen test has better sensitivity, whereas the C. difficile toxin test has better specificity. However, Senoh et al [ 9 ] reported that the sensitivity and specificity of the C. difficile antigen test were 73% and 87%, respectively, which are lower in Japan than in Western countries. In addition, Deshpande et al [ 19 ] reported that among patients diagnosed with CDI who were positive for the C. difficile toxin, results were positive in the second (2.7%) and third tests (2.3%) despite a negative first test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the number of CDI cases is gradually increasing worldwide [ 5 ], the background characteristics and clinical management of pediatric patients with CDI have not been fully clarified. In addition, despite some researchers reporting the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of C. difficile antigen/toxin tests, their reliability in diagnosing CDI in pediatric patients remains unknown [ 6 7 8 9 ]. Therefore, this study investigated the background and clinical course of pediatric patients with CDI in a tertiary children’s hospital in Japan and analyzed the reliability of each diagnostic test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since clostridial toxins degrade rapidly, the toxin EIA testing has relatively poor sensitivity [ 41 , 42 ]. This necessitates the use of a second, more sensitive, test alongside toxin EIA testing [ 9 , 41 , 43 ]. Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) is an antigen found in high levels in C. difficile and is not present in appreciable levels in other related organisms [ 44 ].…”
Section: Laboratory Tests To Diagnose CDImentioning
confidence: 99%