2019
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2019.2909683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Kramers–Kronig Receivers in the Presence of Local Oscillator Relative Intensity Noise

Abstract: There is increasing interest in low-complexity coherent optical transceivers for use in short-reach fiber links. Amongst the simplest configurations is the heterodyne coherent receiver, using a 3-dB coupler to combine the signal with the local oscillator (LO) laser output, and a single photodiode for detection of each polarization. In this paper, through numerical simulations, we investigate the impact of signal-signal beating interference (SSBI) and LO relative intensity noise (RIN) on the performance of such… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further increasing the CSPR above 12 dB would lead to performance degradation due to the increased impact of the carrier-RIN beating term. The above-described trend of the BER curves agrees with that seen in [2], [23], yet for the different simulation parameters.…”
Section: Transmission Performancesupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further increasing the CSPR above 12 dB would lead to performance degradation due to the increased impact of the carrier-RIN beating term. The above-described trend of the BER curves agrees with that seen in [2], [23], yet for the different simulation parameters.…”
Section: Transmission Performancesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The employed light sources have 1 MHz linewidth. Relative intensity noise (RIN) of the laser sources is included in the simulations and modelled as white Gaussian noise; its level is set to −139 dBc/Hz, which is a typical value for low-cost distributed feedback laser diodes [23]. After E/O conversion, the output of each transmitter section is multiplexed using a WDM MUX.…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting signal is sent to an ideal DAC (i.e., without quantization and without bandwidth limitation) where electrical to optical conversion is performed by an IQ modulator biased at the null point. The IQ modulator is driven by a laser source operating at 1550 nm with 1 MHz linewidth and a relative intensity noise of −139 dBc/Hz, which are typical values for low-cost distributed-feedback (DFB) laser diodes [28]. The WDM channels are multiplexed with a channel spacing of 40 GHz by a WDM-MUX that has the same channel spectral response of the optical filter employed at the receiver.…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the noise variance becomes non-stationary, and compresses the noise at high levels. Although the KK processing can theoretically reconstruct an output similar in quality to a balanced-photodiode coherent receiver, it requires that the carrier level be increased to between 6-10 dB above the signal level [20]. Thus, higher optical powers need to be transmitted to support this carrier level, unless a local oscillator provides a substitute carrier at the receiver [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%