2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of J-CTO and PROGRESS CTO Scores in Predicting Angiographic Success and Long-term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Chronic Total Occlusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have suggested a long-term survival advantage for CABG compared with PCI in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease [10] . Moreover, the success rate of LCX-CTO was the lowest; many studies have con rmed that the successful opening of LCX-CTO has not seen obvious clinical bene ts [11] , and LCX-CTO is more di cult to open, one of the diagnostic criteria of the PROGRESS-CTO score is LCX-CTO [12] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have suggested a long-term survival advantage for CABG compared with PCI in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease [10] . Moreover, the success rate of LCX-CTO was the lowest; many studies have con rmed that the successful opening of LCX-CTO has not seen obvious clinical bene ts [11] , and LCX-CTO is more di cult to open, one of the diagnostic criteria of the PROGRESS-CTO score is LCX-CTO [12] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The clinical and lesion-related (CL) score 17 is primarily focused on antegrade procedures, and hence, it would be more useful for antegrade-only operators. On the other hand, the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO) score, 18 the ORA (ostial location, Rentrop grade <2, age ≥75 years) score 19 and the Castle (EUROCTO club) 20 may be more suitable for predicting recanalization success in retrograde or hybrid procedures. Additionally, the PROGRESS-CTO complication score assesses the preoperative risk of complications using three variables (age ≥65 years, lesion length >23mm, and use of the retrograde approach).…”
Section: Preoperative Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To select between the CTO-PCI and CABG procedures, we should consider the initial success rates and chronic outcomes, including revascularization. The performance of the PROGRESS CTO score for the prediction of long-term outcomes was tested recently, and the score was associated with the MACCE risk, albeit vigorous statistical adjustment was not performed [13]. To clarify the risk estimation of MACCE and refining the indication for CTO-PCI, a universal risk stratification was needed for assessing CTO-PCI as a suitable option for the treatment of ischemic heart disease.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these risk models do not effectively predict long-term outcomes following the procedure. Recently, the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of CTO Intervention (PROGRESS CTO) [11] score, developed to predict the success of CTO-PCIs, was reported to be a useful tool in predicting long-term outcomes [13], albeit the study population was small and the procedural success rates were lower than that in conventional CTO studies [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%