2012
DOI: 10.1021/pr300192f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Isobaric and Isotopic Labeling in Quantitative Plant Proteomics

Abstract: Mass spectrometry has become indispensable for peptide and protein quantification in proteomics studies. When proteomics technologies are applied to understand the biology of plants, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis is still the prevalent method for protein fractionation, identification, and quantitation. In the present work, we have used LC-MS to compare an isotopic (ICPL) and isobaric (iTRAQ) chemical labeling technique to quantify proteins in the endosperm of Ricinus communis seeds at three development… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage labeling efficiency was calculated based on the total number of high confidence unique peptide sequence identifications (denominator, determined at a 1% false discovery rate (FDR) cutoff using Percolator) and the number of unique peptides carrying a TMT label (numerator) which was considered as variable during the database search 5 (see Table 1). Irrespective of the instrument used and the resulting analytical depth, the labeling efficiencies of the two protocols, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage labeling efficiency was calculated based on the total number of high confidence unique peptide sequence identifications (denominator, determined at a 1% false discovery rate (FDR) cutoff using Percolator) and the number of unique peptides carrying a TMT label (numerator) which was considered as variable during the database search 5 (see Table 1). Irrespective of the instrument used and the resulting analytical depth, the labeling efficiencies of the two protocols, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the ratios of the ion intensities of these sister peptide pairs, the relative abundance of their parent proteins in the original samples can be determined [68]. Recently, a detailed experimental protocol called postdigest ICPL was published highlighting a better protein identification and quantification [69, 70] and when compared to iTRAQ, both techniques have shown comparable number of identified and quantified proteins in the endosperm of castor bean seeds at three developmental stages [71]. So far, the latter study is the unique reported quantitative proteomic investigation on plants using ICPL (Table 2).…”
Section: Overview Of Label-based Proteomic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to Arabidopsis, castor bean (Ricinus communis), a member of Euphorbiaceae family, has relatively large and persistent endosperm throughout seed development (Greenwood and Bewley, 1982). It has been considered as a model plant for studies on endosperm and seed development among dicots (Houston et al, 2009;Nogueira et al, 2012). Also, castor bean is one of the most important nonedible oilseed crops, and its seed oil stored in endosperm is used broadly in industry (Ogunniyi, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%