2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1513-8_32
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Internal Cluster Validations Measures For Evolutionary Clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sehingga pada penelitian ini, kluster validation yang digunakan hanya Internal kluster validation karena tidak terdapat label eksternal yang diketahui untuk dijadikan acuan pada external cluster validation. Fungsi yang digunakan adalah cluster.stats dari library fpc pada RStudio [12].…”
Section: E Proses 5: Validate Resultsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sehingga pada penelitian ini, kluster validation yang digunakan hanya Internal kluster validation karena tidak terdapat label eksternal yang diketahui untuk dijadikan acuan pada external cluster validation. Fungsi yang digunakan adalah cluster.stats dari library fpc pada RStudio [12].…”
Section: E Proses 5: Validate Resultsunclassified
“…Average Between didapatkan dengan menjalankan perintah stat$average.between pada RStudio. Average within didapatkan dengan menjalankan perintah stat$average.within pada RStudio [12].…”
Section: Issn 2085-4579unclassified
“…The clustering performance is measured in two datasets, Genia and Biotext. Document clustering is performed using the k-mean clustering method of P (T | D).There are two methods for clustering validation, and internal validation method is more accurate than external validation [50]. We use the internal validation method of the Calinski-Harabasz index to evaluate multiple topics and clusters.…”
Section: Clustering Of Documentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, it deals with data sets whose clusters present asymmetry in their geometries. The work by Nerurkar et al 30 focuses on the use of internal validation criteria, in particular the BetaCV and Dunn internal indices, as cost functions of swarm optimizers. In a similar way, Reséndiz, Castro, and Leal 31 propose the use of clustering validation indices and maximum entropy as cost functions to quantify the quality of automatic image segmentation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%