2007
DOI: 10.2989/ajrfs.2007.24.3.6.299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Stylosanthes hamata in the rangelands of northern Ghana

Abstract: Stylosanthes hamata (stylo) was introduced into communities in the Northern SavannaZone of Ghana in 1994 for rangeland improvement through oversowing. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of S. hamata in northern Ghana. The study was carried out in 15 communities in five districts in September 2003. The instruments used to gather data were questionnaires, direct field measurements and field observations. The results of the study indicated that stylo plants were found in places where overso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there has been technical success with oversowing legumes (e.g., Mengistu 2002 ), there is limited evidence of widespread adoption due to upfront establishment costs and risks associated with successful pasture establishment in a variable climate. There are also challenges with slow establishment of oversown legumes ( Miller and Stockwell 1991 ) although there is evidence of successful establishment in African communal grazing lands ( Annor and Cofie 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there has been technical success with oversowing legumes (e.g., Mengistu 2002 ), there is limited evidence of widespread adoption due to upfront establishment costs and risks associated with successful pasture establishment in a variable climate. There are also challenges with slow establishment of oversown legumes ( Miller and Stockwell 1991 ) although there is evidence of successful establishment in African communal grazing lands ( Annor and Cofie 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%