OCEANS 2011 IEEE - Spain 2011
DOI: 10.1109/oceans-spain.2011.6003604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of hydro-acoustic data transmission in horizontal channels using sweep-spread signaling and turbo-coding

Abstract: Using the sweep-spread carrier it can be demonstrated that in result of optimal filtering of dominated (synchronous) multipath all other (non-synchronous) multipahts become attenuated. This causes an increase of the ratio between the energy of synchronous multipath component and scattered energy of non-synchronous multipaths. Thus the probability distributions of signal envelope and phase become closer to Gaussian one. So the use of the sweep-spread carrier in hydroacoustic channels allows for application of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 shows the superposition of several of multipath intensity profiles recorded in the test on data transmission over the distance of 328 m. Their comparison with multipath intensity profile obtained by the simulations (Fig. 4) shows their similarity, both in terms of the number of multipath arrivals (3)(4) and the their excess propagation delays (about 4 ms). The difference consists in their levels (differences between arrivals expected to be larger when simulating their propagation), as well as in dynamics of the arrivals (when simulating their propagation the dynamics expected to be less).…”
Section: Experimental Results and Characterization Of The Acousticmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…6 shows the superposition of several of multipath intensity profiles recorded in the test on data transmission over the distance of 328 m. Their comparison with multipath intensity profile obtained by the simulations (Fig. 4) shows their similarity, both in terms of the number of multipath arrivals (3)(4) and the their excess propagation delays (about 4 ms). The difference consists in their levels (differences between arrivals expected to be larger when simulating their propagation), as well as in dynamics of the arrivals (when simulating their propagation the dynamics expected to be less).…”
Section: Experimental Results and Characterization Of The Acousticmentioning
confidence: 63%