2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of high strength concrete containing recycled rubber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
43
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compressive strength values after 7 and 28 days are shown in Figure 4. These results are in accordance with a previous study of Abdelmonem et al (2019), which showed a decreasing compressive strength with an increasing rubber aggregate content. As shown in Figure 4, the 28-day compressive strength of concrete reduces by 25% when 10% of coarse aggregate is replaced with rubber aggregate.…”
Section: Optimum Percentage Of Rubber Replacementsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compressive strength values after 7 and 28 days are shown in Figure 4. These results are in accordance with a previous study of Abdelmonem et al (2019), which showed a decreasing compressive strength with an increasing rubber aggregate content. As shown in Figure 4, the 28-day compressive strength of concrete reduces by 25% when 10% of coarse aggregate is replaced with rubber aggregate.…”
Section: Optimum Percentage Of Rubber Replacementsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, the deformability of the rubber aggregates themselves compared to the surrounding cementitious matrix causes cracks to initiate in concrete under loading (Khatib and Bayomy, 1999). A study by Abdelmonem et al (2019) showed a reduction of strength from 65 MPa to 35 MPa when 30% of rubber aggregates were used in high strength concrete. The study of Raffoul et al (2016) showed that the strength further reduces as the particle size of recycled tire aggregates increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the age of 45 days, compressive strength begins to decrease for the reference concrete and concrete RC10%, there is a loss of 10.7% for the reference concrete against a loss of 7.6% for concrete RC10%, and between the ages of 45 and 180 days. Boukour and Benmalek [10] and Abdelmonem et al [1] noted similar results in similar works. On the other hand, for RC17.5% and RC25% rubber concretes, the compressive strength continues to increase.…”
Section: Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Many researchers studied various waste and by-product materials that are available in the local market to find a proper substitute for natural aggregate while eliminating the transportation pollution and expenses [19,20]. For example, recycled concrete aggregate [21][22][23][24][25][26][27], recycled tires [28][29][30][31][32], post-consumer glass [33][34][35][36], recycled plastic [37][38][39], and steel by-product aggregate have been suggested a replacement for fine or coarse aggregate [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. Steel slag aggregate, a by-product of the steel manufacturing process, is another possibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%