2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310)
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2001.1008498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of high pressure Xe/TMA in GEMs for neutron and X-ray detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
16
1

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A drawback to the use of pressurised gaseous detectors, particularly, micropattern detectors such as MSGCs, GEMs and MHSPs, relates to the fact that detector gain drops with increasing gas pressure [4,6,15,16]. The gain limitation is due to the lower values of the Townsend first ionisation coefficient at higher gas pressure.…”
Section: B the Stopping Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A drawback to the use of pressurised gaseous detectors, particularly, micropattern detectors such as MSGCs, GEMs and MHSPs, relates to the fact that detector gain drops with increasing gas pressure [4,6,15,16]. The gain limitation is due to the lower values of the Townsend first ionisation coefficient at higher gas pressure.…”
Section: B the Stopping Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gain limitation is due to the lower values of the Townsend first ionisation coefficient at higher gas pressure. For a single GEM detector, CF 4 fillingpressures above 2-bar deliver gains below 10, too low to be of any use in neutron detection [4]. carbon-based molecules, such as propane and C 3 F 8 , the situation is even worse, and it is not possible to operate the GEM with suitable gains at the required filling pressure [4].…”
Section: B the Stopping Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations