2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of glycated albumin for type 2 diabetes and prediabetes diagnosis in a South African population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study evaluated the performance of GA in Caucasian subjects from Italy [17] using HbA 1c only as a reference test and reported that the optimal threshold value (GA >14.0%) had sensitivity of 72.2% and specificity of 71.8% for diagnosis of DM. Lately, a study which examined African subjects [18] using OGTT as reference test referred the optimal cut-off value for GA as 14.9%, similar to the optimal threshold of GA of 14.8% reported in this present study. However, it should be noticed that, in this African study the suggested point in the ROC curve is not the point with the best equilibrium between sensitivity and specificity, as sensitivity and specificity for this GA threshold were 64.8% and 93.5%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another study evaluated the performance of GA in Caucasian subjects from Italy [17] using HbA 1c only as a reference test and reported that the optimal threshold value (GA >14.0%) had sensitivity of 72.2% and specificity of 71.8% for diagnosis of DM. Lately, a study which examined African subjects [18] using OGTT as reference test referred the optimal cut-off value for GA as 14.9%, similar to the optimal threshold of GA of 14.8% reported in this present study. However, it should be noticed that, in this African study the suggested point in the ROC curve is not the point with the best equilibrium between sensitivity and specificity, as sensitivity and specificity for this GA threshold were 64.8% and 93.5%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Though GA data have been accumulating in Asian population [1215], limited data are available in other regions. There are few studies with non-Asians that report on the validity of GA test in screening and diagnosis of DM [1618]. One study [16] evaluated the performance of GA in obese youth mainly Hispanic North Americans and suggested GA ≥12% as the cut point when using 2hPG as a reference test and GA ≥14% when HbA 1c is a reference test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three studies directly compared the performance of different diagnostic tests, with varied results. Hird et al 2016 reported a similar prevalence irrespective whether FPG, 2-h glucose or HbA1c was used [ 41 ], while Erasmus et al 2012 found that FPG was approximately 36% more sensitive than 2-h glucose [ 12 ], and Zemlin et al 2019 demonstrated that 2-h glucose was 30% more sensitive than FPG [ 42 ]. Eight studies reported T2DM prevalence by gender.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to discern the various conditions related to diabetes and to assess the value of GA based on the presence of comorbidity [ 35 ]. For example, Koga et al reported that serum GA levels are significantly lower than HbA1c in diabetic patients with preserved insulin secretion [ 55 , 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Ga and Cardio-metabolic Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%